Quarterly Journal of Quantitative Economics (JQE)

The Effects of Government Expenditure Shocks on Input Efficiency and Consumer Preferences in Iran

https://doi.org/10.22055/jqe.2020.24789.1814
Volume 17, Issue 3 - Serial Number 66
Vol. 17, No. 3, Autumn 2020
Autumn 2020
Pages 1-19
Quarterly Journal of Quantitative Economics (JQE)

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Karim Eslamloueyan 1
Tavakoli Hasan 2

1 Professor of Economics, Department of Economics, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.

2 Ph.D. candidate, Department of Economics, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran..

Abstract
The role of government expenditure in the economy is studied by many prominent economists. This study investigates the effects of government expenditure shocks on macroeconomic variables in Iran for the period 1978-2016. More specifically, we study the impact of two different government expenditure shocks, namely, government consumption and investment, on output, private consumption, private investment, real wages, and employment are investigated. Moreover, this study examines the relationship between government spending and the behavior of firms and consumers. Hence, our model explores the role of government investment and consumption in the production function and utility function, respectively. To this end, we model the behavior of firms, consumers, government, and monetary authority by using a New Keynesian dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) framework. This framework allows us to examine the effects of both real and nominal shocks on macroeconomic variables when markets are imperfect and prices are not fully flexible. To apply the model to the Iranian economy, we assume that the monetary policy of the Central Bank of Iran is based on the money growth rule. Since the government in Iran finances part of its expenditures from oil exports, we assume that the Iranian government budget is financed by oil revenue, tax, issuing bonds, and borrowing from the central bank. The model allows us to examine the effect of different government expenditure shocks on firm productivity and consumer preferences. It shows how dependent is the firm productivity on public capital and the consumer preferences on government consumption.  
After solving the model and deriving the first-order conditions, we linearized the model around the steady state. The model is estimated by the Bayesian method. According to the estimation results of our model with price stickiness, public capital affects production function, and government consumption has a direct impact on the utility function. MCMC univariate and multivariate convergence diagnostic tests, matching priors and posteriors distributions, and the final value of likelihood ​​for pattern evaluation are used to evaluate the model. Moreover, the model is evaluated by matching smoothed shocks figures and historical and smoothed variables figures. The model passes the required diagnostic tests and seems to be appropriate to study the behavior of the Iranian economy. Finally, the impulse response functions for government consumption and investment shocks are used to examine the dynamics of macroeconomic variables, including output, private consumption, private investment, real wages, and employment in Iran. The results show that the accumulation of public capital enhances firm productivity in Iran. Moreover, we find out that consumer preferences are affected by government consumption. Based on our results, a shock to public consumption increases private investment, output, employment, and real wages. However, there is a substitution relationship between public consumption and private consumption. Moreover, a shock to public investment increases output, employment, and real wages and decreases private consumption. Furthermore, we find that there is a complementary relationship between public investment and private investment. Our findings underscore the role of public investment in boosting the economy. Hence, government investment in infrastructures might enhance private investment. This finding might have important policy implications for policymakers in Iran.

Keywords

Keywords: Government expenditure Shocks
Firm productivity
Consumer preferences
Iran
DSGE
Subjects
Ai, C. & Cassou, S. P. (1995). A normative analysis of public capital. Applied Economics, 27, 1201-1209.##Akpan, U. A. & Atan, J. A. (2015). Macroeconomic effects of fiscal policy shock in Nigeria: a svar approach. International Journal of Business and Economics Research, 4(3), 109-120. ##Aschauer, D. A. (1985). Fiscal policy and aggregate demand. American Economic Review, 75, 117-127. ##Aschauer, D. A. (1989). Is public expenditure productive? Journal of Monetary Economics, 23, 177- 200. ##Bahrami, J. & Rafei, M. (2014).  Fiscal reaction appropriate in front of stochastic shocks (dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model). Journal of Economic Research of Iran,58, 1-37 (in Persian). ##Bahrami, J. & Sadatghoreishi, N. (2011). Monetary policy analysis in iran using dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model. Economic Modeling Quarterly,13, 1-22 (in Persian). ##Bailey, M. J. (1971). National Income and the Price Level, New York: McGraw-Hill. ##Bi, H., Shen, W., Shu-Chun & Yang, S. (2016). Fiscal limits in developing countries: a DSGE approach. Journal of Macroeconomics, 49, 119-130. ##Blanchard, O. J. & Kahn, C. M. (1980). The solution of difference models under rational expectations. Econometrica, 48(5), 1305-1311. ##Brooks, S. & Gelman, A. (1998). General methods for monitoring convergence of itrative simulations. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics. December 1998. ##Central Bank of Islamic Republic of Iran (2019). Annual report. Retrievid from http://tsd.cbi.ir/##Calvo, G. A. (1983). Staggered pricing in a utility maximizing framework. Journal of Monetary Economics, 12, 383-396. ##D´auria, F. (2015). The effects of fiscal shocks in a new keynesian model with useful government spending. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 19, 1380-1399. ##Dixit, A. K. & Stiglitz, J. E. (1977). Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity. American Economic Review, 67(3), 297-308. ##Esfandiyari, M., Dahmarde, N. & Kavand, H. (2013). Dual labor market in the framework of dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model in Iran. Journal of Economic Research,14(1), 217-238 (in Persian). ##Eslamloueyan, K. & Mehralian, S. (2015). The impact of fiscal uncertainty on monetary policy, inflation and production in Iran: A markov square-linear-leap pattern, Journal of Economic Research (in Persian). ##Fotros, M., Tavakolian, H. & Maabudi, R. (2015). The impact of monetary and fiscal shocks on macroeconomic variables- new keynesian dynamic stochastic general equilibrium approach. Journal of Economic Growth and Development Research, 19,73-94 (in Persian). ##Gali, J., Valles, J. & Lopez-Salido, J. D. (2007). Understanding the effects of government spending on consumption. Journal of the European Association, 5(1), 227-270. ##Gordon, R. J. (1990). What is new-keynesian economics? Journal of Economic Literature, 28(3), 1115-1171. ##Hemati, M., Pedram, M. & Tavakolian, H. (2016). The role of sticky information in inflation dynamics in Iran. Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, 60, 107-115 (in Persian). ##Horvath, M. (2009). The effects of government spending shocks on consumption under optimal stabilization. Centre for Dynamic Macroeconomic Analysis Working Paper Series. ##Karras, G. (1994). Government spending and private consumption: Some international evidence. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 26, 9-22. ##Komeyjani, A. & Tavakolian, H. (2012). Monetary-dominated monetary policy and inflation targeting implicit in a dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model of Iran, Economic Modeling Quarterly, 8, 87-117 (in Persian). ##Linnemann, L. & Schabert, A. (2004). Can fiscal spending stimulate private consumption? Economics Letters, 82, 173-179. ##Lynde, C. & Richmond, J.  (1993). Public capital and total factor productivity. International Economic Review, 34, 401-414. ##Mehrara, M. & Ahmadzade, A. (2009). Investigating the role of total factor productivity in the production growth of major economic sectors of Iran. Economic Research, 87, 209-232 (in Persian). ##Mehregan, N. & Daliri, H. (2013). Banks response to monetary policy based on DSGE model. Journal of Economic Research and Policies, 66, 39-68 (in Persian). ##Moshiri, S., Bagheripormehr, S. & Mousavinik, S. H.  (2011). Investigating the degree of fiscal policy dominance in Iran in the form of a dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model. Journal of Economic Growth and Development Research, 2(5), 69-90 (in Persian). ##Mountford, A. and Uhlig, H. (2008). What are the effects of fiscal policy shocks? NBER Working Paper Series. ##Naderan, E. & Fuladi, M. (2002). Providing a general equilibrium model for investigating the impact of government expenditure on households’ production, employment and income. Journal of Economic Research, 5(19), 45-80. (in Persian). ##Posada-Escobar, R. A. & Monteiro, G. (2015). Long-run growth and welfare in a two sector endogenous growth model with productive and non-productive government expenditure. Journal of Macroeconomics. 46, 218-234. ##Prokopenko, J. (1992). Productivity management. Switzerland: International Labour Organisation. ##Ramey, V. A. & Shapiro, M. D. (1998). Costly capital reallocation and the effect of government spending. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 48, 145-194. ##Ravn, M., Schmitt-Grohe, S. & Uribe, M. (2006). Deep habits. Review of Economic Studies, 73: 195-218. ##Samimi, J. A. (1992). Public sector economics 2. First Edition. Tehran: Samt (in Persian). ##Shahabadi, A. (2010). The role of total factor productivity growth in non-oil sector growth in Iran. Journal of Knowledge and Development, 31, 1-29 (in Persian). ##Shahmoradi, A. & Sarem, M. (2013). Optimal monetary policy and inflation targeting in Iran. Journal of Economic Research, 48, 25-42 (in Persian). ##Solow, R. M. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. The Quartery Journal of Economics, 70(1), 65-94. ##Turnovsky, S. J. (2004). The transitional dynamics of fiscal policy: Long-run capital accumulation and growth. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 36, 883-910. ##Yunesi, A., Ghafari, H., Purkazemi, M. & Khodadadkashi, F. (2016). Optimal growth rate of government expenditure: the dynamic optimal control theory. Journal of Economic Growth and Development Research, 22, 145-163 (in Persian). ##
  • Receive Date 22 January 2018
  • Revise Date 20 April 2020
  • Accept Date 04 June 2020
  • First Publish Date 22 October 2020
  • Publish Date 22 October 2020

Home

News

Guide for Authors

Submit Manuscript

Contact Us