Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Assistant professor of Eeconomics and part-time researcher in Kurdistan Research Institute, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran.

2 M.A. in Economics, Department of Economics, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Kurdistan University, Sanandaj, Iran.

Abstract

Extended Abstract
Introduction:
Improving the welfare of citizens is important for governments that are attributed to the welfare state. The Islamic Republic of Iran is no exception to this rule. The first and second paragraphs of Article 43, the twelfth paragraph of Article 3, and Articles 29-31 of the Constitution and all economic development programs fully reflect of this claim. Thus, in order to achieve this, a high percentage of the country’s total revenue sources have been allocated to subsidies for basic goods for many years. However, the inappropriate implementation of support policies has acted in violation of its purpose, i.e. empowerment of the low-income groups. Achieving unexpected results from the implementation of support policies made the country’s officials to decide to pass a law on targeted subsidies. Research conducted on consequences of the implementation of the law on targeted subsidies shows the welfare costs resulting from rising prices, weakening of national production and the spread of unemployment in society. In addition, successive shocks resulting from exchange rate, financial and trade sanctions, and rising liquidity in the years following the implementation of the law on targeted subsidies have prompted researchers to examine the welfare losses incurred by the various income deciles, evaluate the results for proper planning and provide timely information to the country’s officials and planners. Much research has been conducted in this field so far, but there have been few studies that show the difference in the cost of living in different parts of Iran, as influenced by cultural, economic and geographical factors. In addition, the success of economic development programs in providing welfare to the low-income groups has not been studied yet. Failure of planners to attend to the welfare status of citizens by geographical areas of the country will lead to the failure of welfare programs despite spending time and exorbitant costs. The present study examines the welfare losses of commodity inflation for urban households in the western and northwestern provinces of Iran in the fourth and fifth development plans to take a step to address this shortcoming.
 
Methodology:
In the present study, the data on price, total household expenditures and expenditures spent on the following 7 commodity groups are used: food, beverages and tobacco, housing and fuel, clothing and footwear, transportation and communications, miscellaneous goods and services, home appliances and furniture, entertainment and cultural affairs and education. These data have been extracted from the statistics on expenses and income of urban households during 2004-2015 in the Statistics Center of Iran and the price index chapter of statistical yearbooks of the whole country. The collected data are based on the linear expenditure system/model using the seemingly unrelated regression method. In this model, which consists of several equations, despite the distinction between independent and dependent variables of these equations, using the same data in them violates one of the classical assumptions (zero covariance of random error sentences) and leads to uncertainty in the estimators’ results. In order to solve this problem, sur method is a suitable method for estimating the system of equations.
 
 
 
Findings:
Findings from poverty line calculations in the first year of the Fourth Development Plan show the highest and lowest monthly poverty lines for the provinces of Kurdistan and East Azerbaijan, respectively. At the end of the plan, this situation was for Lorestan and Zanjan provinces, respectively. At the end of the Fifth Development Plan, urban households in East Azerbaijan faced the highest cost to meet essential needs, while Ilam province was in the opposite point. At the beginning of the Fifth Development Plan, however, the situation for the two provinces was quite the opposite. The ranking study shows that the compensatory changes of a few percent of the income of urban households in different provinces on average in development programs indicate the first ranks in both development programs for Kurdistan province compared to other provinces. The increase in the prices of three commodity groups of food, beverages and tobacco, housing and fuel, and health and treatment has had the greatest welfare losses in the fourth and fifth development plans for the urban areas of Ilam and West Azerbaijan provinces, respectively.
Results:
In the present study, the highest welfare losses were due to rising prices of food, beverages and tobacco, housing and fuel, and health and treatment, and the result was contrary to the goals pursued in the Constitution and, in parallel, economic development plans. Thus, it is necessary to reduce the cost of food production by using new technologies with less energy consumption, which are the main input of agricultural production, but, in contrast, have faced a large increase in price after the targeted subsidies. In addition, officials need to be more sensitive to the consequences of policies that increase housing prices. On the other hand, allocating a larger share of government resources to free education and health services with a proper distribution throughout the country will promote human capital and, consequently, improve the welfare of households.

Keywords

Arman mehr, M.R, Farahmandmanesh, A. (2017). Studying the Effect of Price Changes on the Welfare of Urban Households Disaggregated By Income Deciles and Commodity Groups. Economic Modeling, 11(39), 49-74. Avalabale at: http://eco.iaufb.ac.ir/article_600429.html?lang=en (in Persion)##Ashrafi, Y., & siami-araqhi, e. (2016). Estimating Consumers welfare change in urban regions of Iran emphasized on subsidies targeting. quarterly journal of Economic Research and policies. 24 (77), 163-182. Available at: http://qjerp.ir/article-1-1098-en.html (in Persion). ##Amiri, J.T. (2015). Typology of Islamic republic of Iran welfare system based on Anderson`s three welfare states model. Science and Technology Policy, 1, 6-13. Available at: http://stpl.ristip.sharif.ir/article_1456.html  (in Persion) ##Babapour, M. (2019). The Role of Different Costs on the Inequality of Iranian Urban Households. Quarterly Journal of Quantitative Economics (the former Economic Studies),16(3) , 33-66. Doi: 10.22055/JQE.2019.24805.1816 (in Persion) ##Bahrami, R. (2017). An analysis of urban  poverty in Kurdistan Province. Geographical Engineering of the land, 1(2), 1-14. Available at: http://www.jget.ir/article_50413.html?lang=fa (in Persion) ##Bazazan, F., Qasemi, A., Raghfar, H., & Hasanvand, S. (2015). The  Effectiveness of Public Policies in Reducing Poverty In Iran. Quarterly Journal of Economic Development Policy, 3(8), 9-32. Doi: 10.22051/EDP.2016.2459  (in Persion)  ##Boughanmi, H., Alshamakhi, A., Mbaga, M., & Kotagama, H. (2014). Evaluation of the 2006-2008 food crisis on household welfare: The Case of the sultanate of Oman. Economica Research International, 1-7. ##Chang, T., & Fawson, Ch. (1994). An application of the linear expenditure systems to the pattern of consumer behavior in taiwan. Economic research institute study papers, 1-14. ##Easterly, W., & Fisher S. (2001). Inflation and the poor. Journal of money, credit and banking, 33(20), 1-31. ##Fallahi, F., Mohammadzadeh, P., & Hekmati-farid, S. (2013). The Welfare Effects of Price Changes in the Main Commodity Groups in Iran. Journal of Economic Research, 48(2), 131-150. Doi: 10.22059/JTE.2013.35171 (in Persion) ##Fitzpatrick, T. (2002). Welfare Theory, Translated by Hormoz Homayounpour, Tehran, Game-Now publication. (in Persion). ##Galli, R., & Vanderhoeven, R. (2001). Is inflation bad for income inequality: the importance of the initial rate of inflation. Employment paper, (29), 1-38. ##Giddens, A. (1994). Sociology, Translated by Manouchehr Sabouri, Ney publication, Tehran. (in Persion). ##Gilak-hakimabadi, M.T., Zarouki, Sh., & Rahmati, S. (2017). The Welfare Loss of Rising Food Prices: Application of Panel- SURE Regression in Iranian Provinces. Quarterly Journal of Quantitative Economics (the former Economic Studies), 14(4), 53-92. Doi: 10.22055/JQE.2018.21297.1590 (in Persion) ##Jafari-samimi, A., Zarouki, Sh., & Amiri, S.R. (2018). Economic Welfare Analysis with an Emphasis on Aspects of Globalization. Quarterly Journal of Economic Modeling. 12(4), 1-23. http://eco.iaufb.ac.ir/article_663778.html?lang=en (in Persion) ##Kafaie, M.A., Garshasbi, R. (2016). Subsidy reform, cash payments and welfare of Iranian houeholds. Iranian Economic Reviewe. 20 (1), 1-19. ##Kamijani, A., & Mohammadzadeh, F. (2014). The Effect of Inflation on Income Distribution and Performance of Compensation Policies. Quarterly Journal of Economic Research and Policies, 22(69), 5-24. Available at: http://qjerp.ir/article-1-127-fa.html (in Persion) ##Khosravinejad, A.A. (2013). Assessing the effects of market regulation policies of basic goods on household welfare. Institute for Trade Studies & Research, Research project, 1-165. Available at: http://trindoc.itsr.ir/ProductPlanDetail.aspx? (in Persion) ##Koch, S., & Bosch, A. (2009). Inflation and the houehold: towards a measurement of the welfare costs of inflation. Working Papers 3488, South African Reserve Bank, 1-52. ##Mortazavi, S. A., Pirooz, R., & Mahmoudgardi, R. (2015). The Effect of Increasing Milk Prices on the Net Welfare of Income Deciles of Urban Groups in Iran. Quarterly Journal of Economic Research (the former Sustainable Growth and Development), 5(3), 23-37. Available at: http://ecor.modares.ac.ir/article-18-1112-fa.html (in Persion) ##Motfaker-azad, M.A., Mohammadzadeh, P., Sadeqi, S. K., & Hekmati-farid, S. (2011). The Welfare Effect of Subsidy Elimination in Basic Goods. Journal of Economics and Modeling, 2(5-6), 161-187. Available at: https://ecoj.sbu.ac.ir/article_57499.html?lang=en (in Persion) ##Mousavi-Samarin, S. S. (2014). Introduction to the concept of welfare, Mobin Papers (Electronic Journal of Mobin Institute of Studies and Research), 2(29), 1-29. Available at: http://jostar.mrsi.ir/Vol.2/jostar29.pdf (in Persion) ##Narayan, P.K., Narayan, S., & Smyth, R. (2009). Understanding the inflation- output nexus for china. China economic review, 82-90. ##Noorullahi, S., Jabbari, A., Moradkhani, N., & Faramarzi, A. (2017). Evaluation of Compensated Variation in Rising Commodity Prices: The Case of Iranian Urban Households. Quarterly Journal of Economic Research and Policies, 25(81), 155-189. Available at: http://qjerp.ir/article-1-1377-fa.html (in Persion) ##Parra, J.C., & Wodon, Q. (2008). Comparing the Impact of food and energy price shoks on counsumers: A Social Accounting Matrix Analysis For Ghana. Policy Research, Working Paper, 1-23. ##Parvin, S., & Banoui, A.A. (2017). The Effects of the First Phase Implementation of Subsidy Targeting on the Welfare of Low Income Households Using Structural Path Analysis. Quarterly Journal of Economic Research (the former Sustainable Growth and Development), 7(3), 193-225. Available at: http://ecor.modares.ac.ir/article-18-11398-fa.html (in Persion) ##Prifti, E., Daidone, S., & Miguelez, B. (2017). Impact of increases in food prices on consumer welfare in Lesotho. African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics. 12, 52-61. ##ameti, M., & Izadi, S. (2014). Welfare Costs of Inflation on Different Income Deciles of Isfahan Urban Households. Quarterly Journal of Iranian Economic Research, 19(59), 117-152. Available at: https://ijer.atu.ac.ir/article_1414.html?lang=en  (in Persion) ##Seyed-Nourani, S.M.R, & Javadi, M. (2005). Study of factors affecting the share of new car costs in the basket of urban household expenditure. Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, 5(17), 237-263. Available at: https://joer.atu.ac.ir/article_3422.html (in Persion) ##Shimeles, A. (2010). Welfare analysis using data from the internatinal camparison program for africa. Working paper series, 1-27. ##Statistical Center of Iran, Detailed results of expenses and income of urban households in the provinces. The years: 2004-2015. (in Persion) ##Statistical Center of Iran, "Statistical Yearbooks". The years 1394-1383. (in Persion). ##Stone, R. (1954). Linear expenditure systems and demand analysis: an application to the pattern of British demand. Economic Journal, 64(255), 511-527##Vice President of Strategic Planning and Supervision. (2010). Collection of the five-year development plan of the Islamic Republic of Iran. (in Persion). ##Vice President of Research, Codification and revision of presidential laws and regulations (2004). The Fourth Economic, Social and Cultural Development Plan of the Islamic Republic of Iran. (in Persion). ##Widodo, T. (2012). Households welfare impact of fuel subsidy removal. MPRA Paper,. Working paper series. Universitas Gadjah Mada, 1-23. ##Zamanzadeh, H., & Shadrokh, M. (2010). Implementing the complementary policies for the successful management of targeted subsidies. Quarterly Journal of New Economics. (129), 4-13. Available at: http://ensani.ir/file/download/article/20120504170947-9021-5.pdf##Zamanzadeh, H., & Shahmoradi, A. (2012). Estimating the Poverty Lines in Iran Based on Household Scale. Quarterly Journal of Economic Modeling. 2(6), 1-18. Available at: http://jemr.khu.ac.ir/article-1-133-fa.html##