نوع مقاله : مقاله مستخرج از رساله دکتری

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری اقتصاد، گروه اقتصاد دانشکده اقتصاد و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران

2 دانشیار اقتصاد، گروه اقتصاد دانشکده اقتصاد و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران.

چکیده

درآمدهای مالیاتی نقش مهمی در پیش برد برنامه های توسعه و بهبود توزیع درآمد در کشورهای مختلف دارند. آگاهی از عوامل تاثیرگذار بر درآمدهای مالیاتی، از جنبه سیاست‌گذاری در این زمینه بسیار حائز اهمیت است. مطالعات پیشین در ایران عمدتاً در بررسی عوامل موثر بر درآمدهای مالیاتی بر روش های خطی متمرکز بوده است. مطالعات جدید نشان می دهد که رفتار مالیاتی می تواند از الگویی غیر خطی تبعیت کند. به بیانی دیگر عوامل موثر بر درآمدهای مالیاتی در سطوح مختلف درآمدهای مالیاتی ممکن است اثرات متفاوتی داشته باشند. به بیانی دیگر ممکن است این متغیرها در مقادیر بالای درآمد مالیاتی اثر منفی و در مقادیر پائین آن، اثر مثبت داشته باشند. این مساله در رگرسیون های خطی مرسوم قابلیت بررسی ندارد. با توجه به این موضوع، هدف این مطالعه بررسی عوامل موثر بر درآمدهای مالیاتی در ایران طی دوره زمانی 1398-1360 با رویکرد رگرسیون کونتایل است که رویکردی پیشرفته در بررسی اثرات نامتقارن بین متغیرهای مستقل و وابسته است. در ابتدا نیز پیش از برآورد مدل، حجم اقتصاد زیرزمینی برای ایران به عنوان یک متغیر تاثیرگذار بر درآمدهای مالیاتی با روش MIMIC برآورد شده است. نتایج این مطالعه نشان داد که اثر متغیرهای درآمد سرانه، ارزش افزوده بخش های خدمات، صنعت و مخارج دولت اثر مثبت و معنی داری بر درآمدهای مالیاتی داشته‌اند. اثر درآمدهای نفتی، نرخ ارز، اقتصاد زیرزمینی و تورم نیز بر درآمد مالیاتی منفی بوده است. سایر نتایج این مطالعه نشان داد که اثر متغیرهای GDP سرانه، ارزش افزوده بخش صنعت، نرخ ارز و درآمدهای نفتی بر درآمد مالیاتی نامتقارن بوده است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Investigating the Asymmetric Effects of Factors Affecting Tax Revenues in Iran using Quantile Regression Approach

نویسندگان [English]

  • Arash Azami 1
  • mohammad noferesti 2
  • abbas arabmazar 2

1 Ph.D. student of Economics, Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Political Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

2 Associate Professor of Economics, Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Political Science, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.

چکیده [English]

EXTENDED ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
The history of human development shows that tax is a necessity in the economy of countries because it is related to the birth, existence and development of government. Not only is tax an important revenue for a governments budget, but also it is related to economic growth, fair distribution and social stability. For this reason, tax and its determining factors play a prominent role in economic literature. In developing countries due to ever-growing needs of citizens and limited resources, government are facing challenges in fulfilling their developmental programs. This situation is exacerbated by, on the one hand, increasing costs of public services and on the other hand the pressure of public opinions. In such conditions it is highly required to optimize public funds through public policies. Tax revenue mobilization is a major concern in economic policy making in many countries. While some countries have experienced a considerable rise in the rate of tax to GDP, others show little or no increase in long periods of time. In developing countries, it is essential to increase tax revenues in order to provide funds for public investments and public services. In recent years, governments and international institutions have been more interested in increasing  tax capacities. this shows  they have realized that tax capacity is the core of state building and development.
 
METHODOLOGY
Deferent variables may differ from country to country due to the level of development, economic structure and the role natural resources play in government revenue. As tax behaviors highly tend to follow asymmetric and non-linear patters, it is of great significance for policy makers to investigate the existence of these effects in asymmetric patterns. In other words, in high levels of tax revenue, the effect and even the sign of effective variables on tax revenue may be different from that of low levels of tax revenue. These results show beneficial resolutions which help policy makers to determine the optimal tax revenues. Regarding this issue, the aim of this study is to analyze the asymmetric effects of influential factors on tax revenue during 1360-1398 with quantile regression approach.
In this article, quantile regression was used to analyze the model. One of the mast important advantages of this method is the deep and thorough insight into response variables. In other words, quantile approach offers a model which makes it possible for variables that influence the dependent variable to interfere not only in the data center of gravity, but also in all distribution sections including its initial and final sequences.
Since quantile regression is capable of creating  models for any kind of quantile, it is more resistant to outlier data and heterogeneity than other methods. Prior to model estimation, the volume of underground economy was estimated through , MIMIC so that the related data enters the research model. That was because underground economy is a hidden variable which is not registered in official statistics and there is not any time series about it. Structural equation model shows the relationship between hidden variables and observed variables as well as observed causes which are called MIMIC.
export can be useful.
 
FINDINGS
The results of model estimation show that per capita income has a positive and significant effect on tax revenues. As the model is logarithmic (except for the variable of inflation rate), the effect of coefficients is the concept of tax revenue elasticity. The results of different quantiles include important tips. In low quantiles of tax revenues per capita income or its elasticity on tax revenue has more effect on tax revenue than in high quantiles. In other words, when the government is earning low levels of tax, increasing per capita income has more effect on tax revenues. These results show that in a period when tax revenues decline, governments efforts to improve economic situation and business increase employment, expand production and increase tax revenues. Similar results have been obtained for added value of industry sector in low quantiles of tax revenue, the effect of added value of industry sector on tax revenues is more than that in high quantiles. Increasing added value of industry sector through expanding industrial products increases the exportation of industrial goods and it consequently increases tax revenues. On the other hand, added value of service sector has insignificant effect on high levels of tax revenues and only in low levels of tax revenues its effects are significant in 90% of confidence level. Furthermore, the effect of added value of agriculture sector is insignificant on tax revenue. Foreign trade has a positive and significant effect on tax revenue. Foreign trade growth and imposing tax on import and export increase tax revenue. This effect is more in low levels of tax revenue. Trade is one of the most important sectors that increases tax revenue. By imposing tax on exportation and importation of different goods governments earn huge amount of tax. Oil  revenue has a negative effect on tax revenues. The effect of underground economy on revenues is also negative and significant. This effect is strengthened particularly in case of high levels of tax revenue. Inflation rate has significant effects on tax revenues only in high quantiles of tax revenue. Finally, the effect of government expenses on tax revenues is also positive and significant. This effect is stronger in low levels of tax revenues. Increasing government expenses in different sectors ca have positive effects on production volume as well as increasing employment. Increasing government  expenses leads to increasing tax revenue through income tax on production and business. Following the process of quantile method, in the next stage after estimating the effects, they must be investigated to be determined as symmetric or asymmetric for this purpose, the test suggested by Newey and Powel (1987) was used. The result of this test showed that the effects of GDP per-capita, added value of industry sector, foreign exchange rate and oil revenues are asymmetric. Other variable in this research had symmetric effects on tax revenues.
 
CONCLUSION
Due to considerable tax revenues governments earn from foreign trade (Export and Import), they can concentrate on open-trade policies because optimal open trade can have a positive effect on tax revenue. It also can reduce underground economy. Not only do such measures help the country to called tax through import and export, but also, they contribute to economic growth and improving infrastructures. Consequently, tax revenue would increase.  On the other hand, the government should enhance economic reconstruction in order to archive industrialization, renovation and increasing the effect on GDP and consequently earn more tax revenue. Moreover, technology transfer, increasing management capabilities through importing modern machinery, advanced technology and achieving management skills of foreign

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Tax Revenue
  • GDP
  • Underground Economy
  • Quantile Regression
  • Iran
Aisha, Z., & Khatoon, S. (2009). Government expenditure and tax revenue, causality and cointegration: The experience of Pakistan (1972-2007). The Pakistan Development Review, 951-959.
Almenar, V., Sánchez, J. L., & Sapena, J. (2020). Measuring the shadow economy and its drivers: the case of peripheral EMU countries. Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja, 33(1), 2904-2918.
Amgain, J. (2017). Estimating optimal level of taxation for growth maximization in Asia. Applied Economics and Finance, 4(3), 47-55.
Attila, J. G., Chambas, G., & Combes, J.-L. (2011). Aide publique au développement et transition fiscale.
Azam, J.-P., Devarajan, S., & O'Connell, S. A. (1999). Aid dependence reconsidered (Vol. 2144): World Bank Publications.
Besley, T., & Persson, T. (2009). The origins of state capacity: Property rights, taxation, and politics. American economic review, 99(4), 1218-1244.
Bird, R. M., Martinez-Vazquez, J., & Torgler, B. (2008). Tax effort in developing countries and high income countries: The impact of corruption, voice and accountability. Economic analysis and policy, 38(1), 55-71.
Boadway, R., & Pestieau, P. (2018). The tenuous case for an annual wealth tax.
Brun, J.-F., Chambas, G., & Laurent, M. (2007). Economie politique de la réforme de transition fiscale: le cas du Maroc. Afrique contemporaine(3), 309-324.
Buchinsky, M. (1998). Recent advances in quantile regression models: a practical guideline for empirical research. Journal of human resources, 88-126.
Chang, T., Liu, W. R., & Caudill, S. B. (2002). Tax-and-spend, spend-and-tax, or fiscal synchronization: new evidence for ten countries. Applied economics, 34(12), 1553-1561.
Cole, T. J., & Green, P. J. (1992). Smoothing reference centile curves: the LMS method and penalized likelihood. Statistics in medicine, 11(10), 1305-1319.
Dadgar, Y., Nazari, R., & SiamiEraghi, E. (2013). Optimum government and tax in public sector economics and in Iran. Journal of Applied Economics Studies in Iran, 2(5), 1-27. Retrieved from https://aes.basu.ac.ir/article_389_74adbb465a67662b4ef5b3154dc25461.pdf [in Persian]
Dargahi, H., & Hadian, M. (2016). Evaluation of Fiscal and Monetary Shocks with Emphasis on the Interactions of Banking System Balance Sheet and the Real Sector of Iran's Economy: A DSGE Approach. Quarterly Journal of Applied Theories of Economics, 3(1), 1-28. Retrieved from https://ecoj.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_4828_b9939ae291d59ca7c7cb04023c7ddbbb.pdf [in Persian]
Garg, S., Goyal, A., & Pal, R. (2017). Why tax effort falls short of tax capacity in Indian states: A stochastic frontier approach. Public Finance Review, 45(2), 232-259.
Gaspar, V., Jaramillo, L., & Wingender, M. P. (2016). Political institutions, state building, and tax capacity: crossing the tipping point: International Monetary Fund.
Grant, S., & Karni, E. (2004). A theory of quantifiable beliefs. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 40(5), 515-546.
IMF. (2018). Review of 1997 Guidance Note on Governance—A Proposed Framework for Enhanced Fund Engagement. IMF Policy Paper.
Ishak, P. W., & Farzanegan, M. R. (2020). The impact of declining oil rents on tax revenues: Does the shadow economy matter? Energy Economics, 92, 104925.
Kaldor, N. (1963). Wili Underdeveloped Countries Learn to Tax?" Foreign Affairs, Vol. 41, No. 2 (January 1963).. r–. Taxation for Economic Development,” Journal of Modern African Studies, 1(1).
Karagöz, K. (2013). Determinants of tax revenue: does sectorial composition matter? Journal of Finance, Accounting & Management, 4(2).
Koenker, R. (2013). quantreg: Quantile Regression. R package version 5.05. R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna) Available at: http://CRAN. R-project. org/package= quantreg.
Koenker, R., & Machado, J. A. (1999). Goodness of fit and related inference processes for quantile regression. Journal of the american statistical association, 94(448), 1296-1310.
Langford, B., & Ohlenburg, T. (2015). Tax revenue potential and effort. Retrieved from
Le, T. M., Moreno-Dodson, B., & Rojchaichaninthorn, J. (2008). Expanding taxable capacity and reaching revenue potential: Cross-country analysis. Paper presented at the Proceedings. Annual Conference on Taxation and Minutes of the Annual Meeting of the National Tax Association.
Li, X. (2001). Government revenue, government expenditure, and temporal causality: evidence from China. Applied economics, 33(4), 485-497.
Maddah, M., Shafiee Nikabadi, M., & Samiee, N. (2016). Investigating and Determining Optimized Tax Rates Applicable to the Optimized Level of Public Goods Demand. Journal of Tax Research, 24(30), 65-105. Retrieved from http://taxjournal.ir/article-1-916-en.html [in Persian]
Mosavi Jahromi, Y., Mehrara, M., & Totonchi Malaki, S. (2020). Evaluation of the Most Important Factors Affecting the Income of Taxes in the Economy of Iran with the Approach of TVP DMA Models. Journal of Tax Research, 27(44), 71-100. doi:10.29252/taxjournal.27.44.71 [in Persian]
Ndoricimpa, A. (2021). Tax reforms, civil conflicts and tax revenue performance in Burundi. Scientific African, 13, e00927.
Newey, W. K., & Powell, J. L. (1987). Asymmetric least squares estimation and testing. Econometrica: journal of the Econometric Society, 819-847.
Nguyen, H. H. (2019). Impact of direct tax and indirect tax on economic growth in Vietnam. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 6(4), 129-137.
OH, K.-W., & KI, E.-S. (2020). Effect of tax-related information on pre-tax income forecast and value relevance. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(1), 81-90.
Oz Yalama, G., & Gumus, E. (2013). Determinants of tax evasion behavior: Empirical evidence from survey data. International Business and Management, 6(2), 15-23.
Pessino, C., & Fenochietto, R. (2010). Determining countries' tax effort. Hacienda Pública Española/Revista de Economía Pública, 65-87.
Reyes-Loya, M. L., & Blanco, L. (2008). Measuring the importance of oil-related revenues in total fiscal income for Mexico. Energy Economics, 30(5), 2552-2568.
Rezagholizadeh, M., & Alami, A. (2023). Institutional Quality and Tax Evasion in Iran. Quarterly Journal of Quantitative Economics, 20(4), 38-86. doi:10.22055/jqe.2021.35404.2283 [in Persian]
Royston, P., & Altman, D. G. (1994). Regression using fractional polynomials of continuous covariates: parsimonious parametric modelling. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics), 43(3), 429-453.
Saddatmehr, M. (2022). Estimating the optimal value added tax rate using the Laffer curve approach. Quarterly Journal of Quantitative Economics (JQE), 19(2), 93-110. doi:10.22055/jqe.2021.32452.2211 [in Persian]
Sameti, M., Amiri, H., & Izadi, S. (2016). The Effect of Optimal Rates of Indirect Tax on Social Welfare in Iran. The Economic Research, 15(4), 51-74. Retrieved from http://ecor.modares.ac.ir/article-18-8375-en.html [in Persian]
Sapiei, N. S., Abdullah, M., & Sulaiman, N. A. (2014). Regressivity of the corporate taxpayers’ compliance costs. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 164, 26-31.
Schneider, F., & Enste, D. H. (2000). Shadow economies: Size, causes, and consequences. Journal of economic literature, 38(1), 77-114.
Tamizi, a. r. (2018). -Investigating determinants of tax revenues in Iran: A Bayesian Econometric Approach. Quarterly Journal of Quantitative Economics (JQE), 15(1), 225-244. doi:10.22055/jqe.2018.22887.1690 [in Persian]
Tanzi, V. (1992). Structural factors and tax revenue in developing countries: a decade of evidence.
Trabandt, M., & Uhlig, H. (2011). The Laffer curve revisited. Journal of monetary economics, 58(4), 305-327.
Trasberg, V. (2013). DYNAMICS OF EUROPEAN TAX STRUCTURES. Paper presented at the DIEM: Dubrovnik International Economic Meeting.
Uhlig, H., & Braun, R. A. (2006). The welfare enhancing effects of a selfish government in the presence of uninsurable, idiosyncratic risk.
WorldBank. (2020). Global economic prospects, June 2020: The World Bank.