Document Type : Review

Authors

1 Ph.D Candidate, Department of Economics, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan, Iran.

2 Associate Professor, Department of Economics, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan, Iran

Abstract

EXTENDED ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
In the oil market, the price of oil depends on the international supply and demand of oil. In general, the factors affecting the price of oil can be divided into two main groups: fundamental factors and non-fundamental factors. Oil has both physical and commodity aspects as well as assets. Changes in fundamental and non-fundamental factors lead to changes in oil prices. Supply and demand are among the fundamental factors and risks and uncertainties, psychological, political, and geopolitical factors, stock exchange and speculation activities in oil financial markets, etc., which cause sudden changes in oil prices are among the non-fundamental factors. One of the signs of the existence of uncertainty in an economic system is high fluctuation in economic variables. The interaction between oil performance and macroeconomics has long attracted attention in the economic literature. Attention to this issue dates back to the 1970s. The 1970s and early 1980s were marked by sharp jumps in oil prices. Adverse oil supply shocks are often considered the main source of macroeconomic fluctuations and stagflation in that period (Blinder & Rudd, 2008).
The present study differs from other studies in two ways compared to other studies. In internal studies, uncertainty related to variables is mainly measured through the conditional heterogeneous variance pattern. The data is an indicator of uncertainty in this study based on the method of Baker et al. (2016) and based on the media. When analyzing economic phenomena in a regression framework, economic theory seldom provides distinct information about the functional form of the relationship between the dependent variable and its independent variables. The simple properties of regression functions – such as models that are linear in parameters – are widely used in experimental applications, as they facilitate both econometric estimation and the economic interpretation of estimated regression parameters. However, the assumption about the functional form of the regression function leads to an error of incorrect parameter specification, which can lead to incorrect economic results and recommendations. In recent years, the rapidly growing literature on nonparametric econometric methods has been a solution to the problems of parametric specification error in econometric regression models. Nonparametric regression methods do not require the researcher to assume and determine a functional form for the relationship between explanatory variables and dependent variables. Thus, the functional form is determined by the data instead of the researcher making arbitrary decisions. In this aspect, the present study is different from other studies. Therefore, in the present study, considering the role and importance of OPEC in the oil supply and demand and oil prices and its effect on the growth and production of wealth in the world, factors affecting the determination of OPEC oil prices with emphasis on economic policy uncertainty as a representative of non-fundamental factors affecting oil prices, are investigated for a selection of OPEC member countries from 2003-2017 using non-parametric regression.
 
METHODOLOGY
The methodology must be clearly stated and described in sufficient detail or with sufficient references. The author should concisely summarize the research framework, and the research methods applied in the study. The summary should include the identification of valid data sources used in the research.
The statistical population in this study is OPEC member countries and the data consist of 6 cross sections between the years 2003-2017. The data were extracted from World Bank reports, the OPEC Database[1], the Economic Policy Uncertainty Database[2], the World Bank Database[3], and the OECD website[4].
The variables of the OPEC real oil price model are dependent and independent including uncertainty of economic policy, industry value added index, real interest rate index, oil rents, renewable energy, and oil price expectations.                                                                 
 
FINDINGS
 By using the kernel regression: local linear estimator, the extent and direction of the effect of global economic policy uncertainty on oil prices is estimated. The table of meanings of the studied variables is given in Appendix One. The results show that the alternative energy index and the interest rate index are fixed with a durable interruption. Also, according to the diagram shown in Appendix 2, in most of the countries studied, the value-added index of the industrial sector, affects the real price of oil by interruption.
In this section, using the findings of kernel regression: local linear estimator in Stata software, the research hypotheses are examined as follows:
Uncertainty in global economic policy has a positive and significant effect on oil prices.
Among the influential factors in oil prices, economic policy uncertainty has the greatest effect.
 
Table 1. Core regression: Local linear estimator for 6 OPEC countries
Source: Resarch Result




Local-linear regression
Kernel: epanechnikov
Bandwidth: cross-validation


Number of obs      =           327
 
R-squared           =          0.9678




Log op


Estimate




Mean
Log op


 
4.210966




Effect
Log un
 
Ope
 
L rr
 
Or
 
L ind
 
 
L re


 
0.3522596
 
0.420129
 
-0.0003032
 
0.0209778
 
0.0169741
 
-1.228478




 
Based on the table, the results show that there is a positive and significant relationship between oil prices and economic policy uncertainty. In terms of the effect on oil prices, the Alternative Energy at -1.2, the Oil Price Expectations at 0.42, and then the Economic Policy Uncertainty at 0.35 have the most effect, respectively.
According to the findings, it can be concluded that for a one percent change in the economic policy uncertainty index, the variable of oil price will change by 0.35 percent. For one unit change in the oil price expectations index, oil prices increase by 42%. The real interest rate with a period of 0.03 percent reduces the real price of OPEC oil; For one unit change in the oil rent index, OPEC oil price increases by 2 percent, and the value added of the industrial sector with a lag increases to the rate of 1.6 percent of the price of oil; the index of alternative and new energies with a lag leads to a decrease in oil prices by 12 percent.
 
CONCLUSION
The present study aims to investigate the effect of economic policy uncertainty on oil prices in selected OPEC countries. In determining the price of oil, fundamental factors including factors related to oil supply and demand, and non-fundamental factors including financial market conditions, speculation, and geopolitics are effective. Given that the countries under study are selected from OPEC and the production and sales quotas are determined by OPEC, factors such as the value added of the industrial sector in each country, alternative energy sources, oil rents, and oil price expectations are among the fundamental factors and the US Federal Reserve real interest rate and economic policy uncertainty are among the non-fundamental factors. Estimation of the model by nonparametric method shows that renewable energy has the greatest effect on oil prices so as the quota of renewable energy in the energy supply increases, OPEC oil prices will fall due to declining demand. The added value of the industrial sector has a positive and significant effect on oil prices. Because of the increase in industrial activities, the oil demand has increased and this will lead to an increase in oil prices. Oil rents have a positive and significant effect on oil prices as the difference between income from oil sales and oil extraction costs. Considering that the income from oil sales is due to the determination of oil production and sales quotas as well as oil prices in OPEC member countries, by reducing oil extraction costs the profitability of the oil industry has increased, and through increasing oil speculation, its prices increase. Oil price expectations, like market expectations for any commodity, affect prices. Expectations of rising oil prices will lead to higher oil prices due to increased precautionary oil demand. According to the research findings, an increase in the Federal Reserve's real interest rate will lead to a decrease in oil prices. On the one hand, raising interest rates increases the cost of maintaining oil on board, and on the other hand, it reduces the net present value of future profits, thus increasing oil supply. Rising interest rates on the Federal Reserve will reduce the price of savings bonds, treasury bills, and stocks. Thus, the profitability of speculative activities in the savings bond market leads to the transfer of cash flow from commodity exchanges such as oil and its derivatives and agricultural products to the savings bond and treasury markets. As a result, oil prices fall. The emergence and spread of economic policy uncertainty will lead to higher oil prices. Since oil has assets in addition to physical and commodity aspects, with the increase of economic policy uncertainty, the possibility of restricting the future supply of oil, as well as increasing precautionary demand and speculation of oil, increases the price of oil. Therefore, the unique situation of OPEC member countries means that the uncertainty of global economic policies is not the most important factor affecting oil prices, and the development of alternative energies has a much greater effect on oil prices, and this necessitates a change in policy and precise planning in oil-rich countries to use alternative energies and produce oil products instead of selling crude. Although the general policies of the system in the field of energy, the diversity of energy resources, and the replacement of exports of oil and gas and petrochemical products with exporting crude oil and natural gas have been emphasized, despite the development of a national energy strategy document in the country, operational and monitoring of its realization should be prepared in a suitable time horizon.
 
[1] https://www.opec.org/opec_web/en/
[2] https://www.policyuncertainty.com/
[3] https://data.worldbank.org/
[4] https://www.oecd.org/

Keywords

Main Subjects

Abebe H., Russell S. & Xibin Z. (2019), Oil prices and EPU: Evidence from a nonparametric panel data mode. Energy Economics,83, 40–51.
Ansari, F., Rezazadeh, A. (2023), The effects of external uncertainty shocks on Iran's macroeconomy. Quarterly Journal of Quantitative Economics, Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript, Available Online from 02 March 2023, https://doi.org/10.22055/jqe.2023.40809.2483
Antonakakis, N., Chatziantoniou, I. & Filis, G. (2014), Dynamic spillovers of oil price shocks and EPU. Energy Economics, 44, 433–447.
Baker, S. R., Bloom, N., & Davis, S. J. (2016). Measuring economic policy uncertainty. The quarterly journal of economics, 131(4), 1593-1636.
Barrero, J. M., Bloom, N., & Wright, I. (2017). Short and long-run uncertainty (No. w23676). National Bureau of Economic Research.
Basher, S. A., & Sadorsky, P. (2006). Oil price risk and emerging stock markets. Global finance journal, 17(2), 224-251.
Baumeister, C., Peersman, G., Van Robays, I. (2010), The Economic Consequences of Oil Shocks: Differences across Countries and Time, RBA Annual Conference Volume (Discontinued), in Renée Fry & Callum Jones & Christopher Kent (ed.), Inflation in an Era of Relative Price Shocks, Reserve Bank of Australia.
Baumeister,  C., Kilian,  L.(2016), A General Approach to Recovering Market Expectations from Futures Prices With an Application to Crude Oil, CESifo Working Paper Series 5782, CESifo.
Blinder, A.S., Rudd, J.B. (2008), The Supply-Shock Explanation of the Great Stagflation Revisited, NBER Working Paper No 14563.
Bloom, N. (2014), Fluctuations in uncertainty, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 153–176.
Bordo, M.D., Duca, J.V., Koch, C. (2016), EPU and the credit channel: aggregate and bank-level US evidence over several decades. Journal of Financial Stability, Vol. 26, pp. 90–106.
Brogaard, J., Detzel, A. (2015), The asset-pricing implications of government EPU, Management Science, Vol. 61, No. 1, pp. 3–18.
Caggiano, G., Castelnuovo, E., Figueres, J.M. (2017), EPU and unemployment in the United States: a nonlinear approach, Economics Letters, Vol. 151, pp. 31–34.
Caggiano, G., Castelnuovo, E., Groshenny, N. (2014), Uncertainty shocks and unemployment dynamics in US recessions, Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 67, pp. 78–92.
Cavalcanti, T., Jalles, J.T. (2013), Macroeconomic effects of oil price shocks in Brazil and the United States, Applied Energy, Elsevier, Vol. 104, No. C, pp. 475-486.
Darmawan, I., Siregar, H., Hakim, D.B., & Manurung, A.H.. (2021). World Oil Price Changes and Inflation in
Indonesia: A Nonparametric Regression Approach. Signifikan: Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi, 10(1), 161 - 176. https://doi.
org/10.15408/sjie.v10i1.19010
Federal Open Market Committee, 2009. Minutes of the December 2009 Meeting, http://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/fomcminutes20091216.htm
Gudarzi Farahani Y., Abbasinejad. H.(2023). Measuring the impact of economic uncertainty impulse on macroeconomic variables: A Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium Approach. Stable Economy Journal, 4(3), 106-133. DOI: 10.22111/SEDJ.2023.44255.1277
Hailemariam, A., Smyth, R., & Zhang, X. (2019). Oil prices and economic policy uncertainty: Evidence from a nonparametric panel data model. Energy economics, 83, 40-51.
Hamilton, J. D. (1983). Oil and the macroeconomy since World War II. Journal of Political Economy, 91(2), 228-248.
Hamilton, J. D. (2003). What is an oil shock? Journal of Econometrics, 113(2), 363-398.
imf. (2012). World economic outlook: Coping with high debt and sluggish growth, IMF Press.
imf. (2013). World Economic Outlook: Hopes, Realities, Risks. Economic outlook, IMF Press.
Kang, W., & Ratti, R. A. (2013a). Oil shocks, policy uncertainty, and stock market return. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 26, 305-318.
Kang, W., & Ratti, R. A. (2013b). Structural oil price shocks and policy uncertainty. Economic Modelling, 35, 314-319.
Kilian, L. (2009). Not all oil price shocks are alike: Disentangling demand and supply shocks in the crude oil market. American Economic Review, 99(3), 1053-69.
Li, D., Chen, J., & Gao, J. (2011). Non‐parametric time‐varying coefficient panel data models with fixed effects. The Econometrics Journal, 14(3), 387-408.
Loungani, P. (1986). Oil price shocks and the dispersion hypothesis. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 68, 536-539.
Mammen, E. (1993), Bootstrap and wild bootstrap for high dimensional linear models. The Annals of Statistics, pp. 255-285.
Peersman, G., & Van Robays, I. (2009). Oil and the Euro area economy. Economic Policy, 24(60), 603-651.
Rehman, M. U. (2018). Do oil shocks predict economic policy uncertainty? Physica A: Statistical mechanics and its applications, 498, 123-136.
 
Seifollahi N. (2018). Investigating the Asymmetric Uncertainty Impact of Oil on Economic Growth by GMM. Quarterly Journal of Quantitative Economics, 15(3), 1-20.
Silvapulle, P., Smyth, R., Zhang, X., & Fenech, J. P. (2017). Nonparametric panel data model for crude oil and stock market prices in net oil importing countries. Energy Economics, 67, 255-267.
Sun, Y., Carroll, R. J., & Li, D. (2009). Semiparametric estimation of fixed-effects panel data varying coefficient models. In Nonparametric econometric methods. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Yu, W., Guo, Y., Zhu, H., & Tang, Y. (2017). Oil price shocks, economic policy uncertainty and industry stock returns in China: Asymmetric effects with quantile regression. Energy Economics, 68, 1-18.
Wen, J., Khalid, S., Mahmood, H., & Yang, X. (2022). Economic policy
             uncertainty and growth nexus in Pakistan: a new evidence using NARDL model. Economic Change and Restructuring, 1-15.
  Zhang, Y. J., & Yan, X. X. (2020). The impact of US economic policy uncertainty on WTI crude oil returns in different time and frequency domains. International Review of Economics & Finance, 69, 750-768.