Document Type : Review

Authors

1 Assistant Professor of Economics, Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran.

2 Associate Professor of Economics, Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran.

3 Associate Professor of Law, Department of low, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran.

4 M.A of Economics, Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran.

Abstract

EXTENDED ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
Human Development Index is a composite one to measure three criteria of longevity, access to knowledge and appropriate level of welfare. Since 2011, education, the combination of mean study years for adults (25 years of age and elder) and expected years of studying, life expectancy and income per capita have been considered as components of Human Development Index. Human Development Index is in fact the geometrical mean of these three indexes. This index is annually calculated for countries by the United Nations but not for their states, provinces, cities and regions. Therefore, researchers themselves must calculate this index for provinces for certain purposes.
 
METHODOLOGY
Lack of such statistics is also a statistic deficit in Iran that has made regional and provincial researches limited and inaccurate. To remove this deficit in this research Khouzestan Human Development Indexes in the years 1996, 2006, 2011 and 2016 have been calculated using the latest formula. It needs to be mentioned that the simulation of Human Development Index is difficult and time consuming. Not paying attention to details can deviate the index. So in order to ensure the precision of calculations, the Human Development of the country has also been calculated and compared with the same index calculated by the United Nations for Iran in order to ensure the authenticity of Human Development Index in Khouzestan. The applied method was a simultaneous behavioral pattern which considers the changes in Human Development Index through components of the United Nations Human Development Index and also simultaneously predicts and includes it in Human Development Index. The estimation method is based on Stock and Watson (1993) Dynamic least squared method that is helpful for predicting variables.
 
FINDINGS
According to results, Khouzestan Human Development Index for the period 1990-2019 can be simulated. The related results are presented in table 1.
 
Table 1. Simulation of Khuzestan Human Development Index

For further investigation of the results of simulation with real data, the results of calculating simulation assessment criteria have been shown in table 2. The results verify the validity of simulation.
 
Table 2. prediction error criteria
As table 10 shows, Khouzestan Human Development Index had a slow rising trend up until 2005 but from 2006, there seems to be a jump or structural failure in Human Development Index. However, during 2016-2018 the trend reached a plateau and it seems to have reached its stabilized level. Also, based on this simulation Khouzestsan Human Development Index was in an average level up until 2008 but since 2009 it has reached its high.
 
CONCLUSION
To assess this hypothesis, in this research using the new formula Khouzestan Human Development Indexes for the years 1996, 2006, 2011 and 2016 were calculated. The results showed that the indexes of life expectancy and education in Khouzestan were in a worse situation than that of the country but the index of income (taking oil into account) was more than that of the country. The calculation of Khouzestan Human Development Index without oil showed a worse situation than that of the country.
Based on results, Kouzestan Human Development Index reached from an average level in 1996 to a high level during 2006 to 2016. This is an acceptable growth. Also, Khouzestan Human Development Index without oil is lower than that of the national index and this represents the worse status of the province compared to the country.
The results of simulating Human Development Index show that up until 1389, there was a slight rising trend but from this year on there has been a jump or failure. Moreover, Khouzestan Human Development Index was in an average level up to 1385 but it has reached a high one since 2010.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Afghah, S. M., Ahangari, A., & Askari por, H. (2020). Estimating Human Development Index of Iranian Provinces and Investigating its Impact on Economic Growth Using Fuzzy Logic. Quarterly Journal of Quantitative Economics, 17(2), 89-121. doi:10.22055/jqe.2019.29152.2064.
Asefzade, S., Jahandideh, S., & Arefeh, M. (2013). Relationship between human development index and the number of scientific articles of countries. JQUMS, 17(2), 33-40.
Basu, S. (1997). The conservatism principle and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings1. Journal of accounting and economics, 24(1), 3-37.
Bhanojirao, V. (1991). Human development report 1990: review and assessment. World Development, 19(10), 1451-1460.
Frazier, J. (1997). Sustainable development: modern elixir or sack dress? Environmental Conservation, 24(2), 182-193.
Gujrati, D. (2004). Basic Econometrics. United States Military Academy, West Point. In: Mc Graw Hill Publications.
Haq, M. (2000). Human development in South Asia 1999: The crisis of governance. In: Oxford University Press Oxford, UK.
Hesari, A. (2015). Human Development Index, Challenges and Its Value for Islamic Republic of Iran at 2011. Iranian Journal of Official Statistics Studies, 26(1), 1-24. Retrieved from http://ijoss.srtc.ac.ir/article-1-134-en.html
Kovacevic, M. (2010). Review of HDI critiques and potential improvements. Human development research paper, 33, 1-44.
Lee, J. W., & Barro, R. J. (2001). Schooling quality in a cross–section of countries. Economica, 68(272), 465-488.
Nawrocki, D. (2001). Finance and Monte Carlo Simulation. Journal of Financial Planning, 14(11), 106-117.
Nayak, P. (2008). Human Development in North East India. Growth and Human Development in North-East India, 151-165.
Ramirez, A., Ranis, G., & Stewart, F. (1997). Economic growth and human development. Retrieved from
Sadegh, B., Majid, D. Z., & Seyed Mojtaba, H. (1385). Investigating the position of the country's provinces from the perspective of human development index  Journal of Knowledge and Development 15(19), 11-39.
saeed Asefzadeh, Mehran Alijanzadeh, & Marjan Nasiri asl. (2013). Correlation between Human Development Index and maternal mortality rate. Health Monitor Journal of the Iranian Institute for Health Sciences Research, 12(6), 559-566. Retrieved from http://payeshjournal.ir/article-1-332-en.html
Selim, J. (2015). Human Development Report 2015. Work for Human Development. UNDP Human Development Reports.
Sen, A. (2000). Development as freedom. DEVELOPMENT IN PRACTICE-OXFORD-, 10(2), 258-258.
Stanton, E. A. (2007). The human development index: A history. PERI Working Papers, 85.
Streeten, P. (1981). First things first: meeting basic human needs in the developing countries: The World Bank.
Zanganeh, M. (2016). Evaluation and Analysis of Human Development Indices in Urban Areas. Geography and Urban Space Development, 3(1), 149-160. doi:10.22067/gusd.v3i1.42556
Zayyari, K., Zanjirchi, S. M., & Sorkhkamal, K. (2010). A Study and Measurement of the Development Degree of the Counties of Khorasan Razavy Province Using TOPSIS Technique. Human Geography Research, 42(2), 17-30. Retrieved from https://jhgr.ut.ac.ir/article_24448_3f1ab5dfe74aae36a6773d800d66581c.pdf