Document Type : Article-Based Dissertations

Authors

1 Ph.D Student in Economics, Arak Branch, Islamic Azad University, Arak, Iran.

2 Associate Professor of Economics, Department of Economics, Arak Branch, Islamic Azad University, Arak, Iran.

3 Assistant Professor of Economics, Department of Economics, Arak Branch, Islamic Azad University, Arak, Iran.

4 Associate Professor of Economics, Department of Economics, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran.

Abstract

EXTENDED ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
Especially since the end of the Cold War, economic sanctions have been increasingly used as an alternative to military action to exert economic pressure on countries for a broad range of objectives. Empirical evidence suggests that sanctions affect the economy of the target countries in various ways. These studies use different approaches examine the adverse effects of sanctions on economic variables such as GDP, production costs, capital formation, trade, government expenditures, exchange rate, private expenditures, and household welfare. Following the 1979 Islamic Revolution, Iran became subject to extensive economic sanctions, which have intensified in recent years. Given the dependence of Iranian economy on oil revenues, the oil sector has been one of the main targets of these sanctions. Banking sanctions have also been used as an attempt to prevent the transfer of oil revenues to Iran as part of “smart sanctions” against the country. Sanctions imposed on Iran’s oil exports can intensify fluctuations in macroeconomic variables by reducing foreign exchange earnings and restricting access to capital and intermediate goods, and impact household welfare by affecting relative prices as well as household income and consumption expenditure. Therefore, the present article examines the impact of oil export sanction on the welfare of households in Iran using Equivalent Variation (EV) criterion. Due to the capabilities of Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) models compared to single-equation models, a recursive dynamic CGE model has been used based on the Social Accounting Matrix (SAM) data of 2016. In order to study and compare welfare changes in different groups of urban and rural households, 70 percent reduction in oil exports has been simulated for the entire period under study.
 
METHODOLOGY
In this study, PEP-1-t, a recursive dynamic CGE model developed by Decaluwe et al. (2013), has been used to investigate the welfare effects of reduction in oil exports. This model is the result of the joint effort between the Partnership for Economic Policy (PEP) and the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) in the context of the African Growth and Development Policy Modeling Consortium (AGRODEP) project. PEP-1-t is a recursive dynamic model with a multi-sector, single-country framework containing a broad set of tax instruments and several categories of workers and capital. It is compatible with social accounting matrices that have the accounts required for the main categories and also has standard assumptions. In this model, labor, capital, and intermediate inputs are used in the production process. At the highest level of production, a Leontief production function is considered which combines intermediate inputs and added value to determine the level of activity. Labor and capital are also combined in a production function with Constant Elasticity of Substitution (CES). Each activity produces one or more commodities. The product is then converted into an export commodity and a market commodity using a Constant Elasticity of Transformation (CET) function. Consumers buy composite goods, which are either imported or produced domestically. The composite of imports and domestic production is determined by the Armington function, which is a CES function. The country in question is a “small country” that receives global export and import prices at a fixed level. By establishing factor market equilibrium, commodity market equilibrium, savings-investment equilibrium, domestic market equilibrium, and export market equilibrium, equilibrium is established in the whole system. This model has a set of simultaneous equations, many of which are nonlinear. In the present article, the impact of oil export sanction has been simulated following Farzanegan et al. (2015). Moreover, to study consumer behavior and calculate welfare changes based on the EV criterion, the Linear Expenditure System (LES) and the Stone-Geary utility function have been used, and EV criterion calculation codes have been incorporated into the model. Since the structure of the SAM as the database of this article should be consistent with the general equilibrium model used, a SAM has been developed for the year 2016. In addition to SAM, a number of behavioral parameters adopted from other studies have been used to solve the model. GAMS software has been used for calibration and simulation.
 
FINDINGS
Regarding the impact of oil export sanction on some macroeconomic variables, the results show that a decrease in oil exports leads to an increase in exchange rate and non-oil exports, as well as a decrease in domestic absorption, total imports and exports, and GDP. Regarding the impact of reduced oil exports on these macroeconomic variables, the results are consistent with Gharibnavaz and Waschik (2017), Farzanegan et al. (2015), Mohammadikhabbazan et al. (2015), Haqiqi and Bahalou (2013), and Haqiqi and Bahador (2015) who also used a CGE modeling approach. In addition, other studies such as Nakhli et al. (2020), Keshavarz Haddad et al. (2020), Kiumarthi et al. (2019), Tuzova and Qayum (2016), Marzban and Ostadzad (2015) and Siddig (2011) have shown the adverse effects of economic sanctions on key macroeconomic variables. As oil exports decrease, the income and consumption expenditures of urban and rural households decline over this period. The decrease in income and consumption expenditures of different groups of urban and rural households has an increasing trend. Also, the upper deciles of urban and rural households experience more decline in their income and expenditures. In addition, the income and expenditures of rural households are more affected than urban households. Calculating the EV as an indicator of household welfare in the studied period shows that the welfare of urban and rural households declines in all groups and the upper deciles experience more decline in welfare. Also, the decline in welfare of all rural household groups during the period is always more than urban households. In addition, with the continuation of the oil export sanction, the gap between the welfare decreasing of rural and urban households declines. Regarding the adverse welfare effects of oil export sanction, similar results have been reported in Farzanegan et al. (2015) and Mohammadikhabbazan et al. (2015) using a static CGE modeling approach, while more limited effects have been reported in Gharibnavaz and Waschik (2017) using the same approach. Marzban and Ostadzad (2015) have also shown the tangible effect of oil sanctions on social welfare by developing a generalized stochastic growth model. Cheptea and Gaigné (2020) and Siddig (2011) have also shown the negative effects of economic sanctions on the welfare of households in the target country. Eventually, sensitivity analysis to the key elasticities of the model demonstrates that by changing the initial elasticities individually and in combination, no significant change is observed, therefore, it confirms that the main results are robust.
 
CONCLUSION
This article investigates the impact of oil export sanction on the welfare of urban and rural households in Iran. To this end, PEP-1-t, which is a recursive dynamic CGE model developed by Decaluwe et al. (2013), has been used based on the SAM data of 2016. Also, the EV criterion has been used to examine welfare changes in different groups of urban and rural households. Between 2012 and 2019, Iran’s crude oil exports have dropped by about 70 percent. Therefore, 70 percent reduction in oil exports has been applied to all periods in the model to simulate the sanction scenario. The results reveal that the reduction in oil exports leads to an increase in exchange rate and non-oil exports, as well as a decrease in domestic absorption, total imports and exports, and GDP. Our results show that with a reduction in oil exports, the income, consumption expenditures, and welfare of urban and rural households decrease, and this downward trend continues over the studied period. Moreover, in both urban and rural households, upper deciles experience more reduction in income, consumption expenditures, and welfare. In addition, the shock of reduced oil exports affects the income, consumption expenditures, and welfare of rural households more strongly than urban households. The results also indicate that although the welfare loss of all rural household groups is always higher than urban households during this period, the welfare gap between rural and urban households decreases as oil export sanction continues. Sensitivity analysis to the key elasticities confirms the robustness of the main results.
 

Keywords

Main Subjects

Asadi, Z., & Yavari, K. (2022). The effect of sanctions on financial instability of Iranian banks. Quarterly Journal of Quantitative Economics, 18(4), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.22055/jqe.2020.30490.2131 [In Persian]
Bajzik, J., Havranek, T., Irsova, Z., & Schwarz, J. (2020). Estimating the Armington elasticity: The importance of study design and publication bias. Journal of International Economics, 127, 103383.
Bapat, N. A., Heinrich, T., Kobayashi, Y., & Morgan, T. C. (2013). Determinants of sanctions effectiveness: Sensitivity analysis using new data. International Interactions, 39(1), 79–98.
Bapat, N. A., & Morgan, T. C. (2009). Multilateral versus unilateral sanctions reconsidered: A test using new data. International Studies Quarterly, 53(4), 1075–1094.
Barber, J. (1979). Economic sanctions as a policy instrument. International Affairs, 55(3), 367–384.
Bayramov, V., Rustamli, N., & Abbas, G. (2020). Collateral damage: The Western sanctions on Russia and the evaluation of implications for Russia’s post-communist neighbourhood. International Economics, 162, 92–109.
Boulanger, P., Dudu, H., Ferrari, E., & Philippidis, G. (2016). Russian roulette at the trade table: A specific factors CGE analysis of an agri-food import ban. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 67(2), 272–291.
Brown, P. (2020). Oil market effects from U.S. economic sanctions: Iran, Russia, Venezuela. Congressional Research Service. https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R46213
Burfisher, M. E. (2016). Introduction to computable general equilibrium models (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Caruso, R. (2003). The impact of international economic sanctions on trade: An empirical analysis. Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy, 9(2).
Cheptea, A., & Gaigné, C. (2020). Russian food embargo and the lost trade. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 47(2), 684–718.
Cory, D. C., Gum, R. L., Martin, W. E., & Brokken, R. F. (1981). Simplified measurement of consumer welfare change. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 63(4), 715–717.
Daoudi, M. S., & Dajani, M. S. (1983). Economic sanctions: Ideals and experience. London; Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Decaluwé, B., Lemelin, A., Robichaud, V., & Maisonnave, H. (2013). PEP-1-t. The PEP standard single-country, recursive dynamic CGE model. In Partnership for Economic Policy (PEP) Research Network, Université Laval, Québec.
Dervis, K., De Melo, J., & Robinson, S. (1982). General equilibrium models for development policy. New York: Cambridge university press.
Drezner, D. W. (1999). The sanctions paradox: Economic statecraft and international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Early, B. R., & Spice, R. (2015). Economic sanctions, international institutions, and sanctions busters: When does institutionalized cooperation help sanctioning efforts? Foreign Policy Analysis, 11(3), 339–360.
Elliott, K. A. (1998). The sanctions glass: Half full or completely empty? International Security, 23(1), 50–65.
Eyler, R. (2007). Economic sanctions: International policy and political economy at work. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Farzanegan, M. R., Khabbazan, M. M., & Sadeghi, H. (2016). Effects of oil sanctions on Iran’s economy and household welfare: New evidence from A CGE model. In Economic Welfare and Inequality in Iran: Developments Since the Revolution (pp. 185–211). MAGKS Joint Discussion Paper Series in Economics.
Felbermayr, G. J., Syropoulos, C., Yalcin, E., & Yotov, Y. (2019). On the effects of sanctions on trade and welfare: New evidence based on structural gravity and a new database. Kiel Working Paper, No. 2131, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW), Kiel.
Fouladi, M. (2012). The impacts of exchange rate variations on prices, GDP, export and import of different economic sectors in Iran using a CGE models approach. The Journal of Planning and Budgeting, 17(2), 127–148. http://jpbud.ir/article-1-614-en.html [In Persian]
Gharibnavaz, M. R., & Waschik, R. (2018). A computable general equilibrium model of international sanctions in Iran. The World Economy, 41(1), 287–307.
Gohin, A. (2005). Decomposing welfare effects of CGE models: An exact, superlative, path independent, second order approximation. Presented at the 8th Annual Conference on Global Economic Analysis, Lübeck, Germany.
Haqiqi, I., & Bahador, A. (2015). Investigating economic effect of oil export reduction in Iran: Financial computable general equilibrium approach. Journal of Monetary & Banking Research, 8(24), 251–284. http://jmbr.mbri.ac.ir/article-1-260-en.html [In Persian]
Haqiqi, I., & Bahalou Horeh, M. (2013). Macroeconomic impacts of export barriers in a dynamic CGE model. Quarterly Journal of Money and Economy, 8(3), 117–150.
Hassanzadeh, M., Sadeghi, H., Usefi, A., Sahabi, B., & Ghanbari, A. (2013). Oil price fluctuations and household welfare in Iran. The Economic Research, 12(4), 55–74. https://ecor.modares.ac.ir/browse.php?a_id=800&sid=18&slc_lang=en [In Persian]
Hoffmann, F. (1967). The functions of economic sanctions: A comparative analysis. Journal of Peace Research, 4(2), 140–159.
Hosoe, N., Gasawa, K., & Hashimoto, H. (2010). Textbook of computable general equilibrium modeling: Programming and simulations. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hosseininasab, E., Abdullahi Haghi, S., Naseri, A., & Agheli, L. (2016). The effects of oil boom and oil revenues management on the optimal path of Iranian macroeconomic variables (Based on dynamic computable general equilibrium). Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, 16(2), 173–200. https://ecor.modares.ac.ir/article-18-2278-en.html [In Persian]
Hufbauer, G. C., Schott, J. J., Elliott, K. A., & Oegg, B. (2007). Economic sanctions reconsidered (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics.
Johansen, L. (1960). A multi-sectoral study of economic growth. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Karimi, M. S., Emamverdi, G., & Karimi, M. (2014). Assess the welfare costs due to exchange rate and energy price increases on consumer welfare costs in Iran. Quarterly Journal of Financial Economics, 8(26), 133–157. http://ecj.iauctb.ac.ir/article_512788.html [In Persian]
Kazerooni, A., Ghorbani, A., & Saghafi, R. (2015). A study of unilateral and multilateral sanctions effectiveness on Iran’s non-oil foreign trade products. Quarterly Journal of Applied Theories of Economics, 2(1), 83–98. https://ecoj.tabrizu.ac.ir/m/article_3805.html?lang=en [In Persian]
Keshavarz Haddad, G., Abounoori, E., & Jahani, T. (2020). Oil revenue uncertainty, sanctions and the volatility of macroeconomic variables. Iranian Journal of Economic Research, 25(82), 1–42. https://ijer.atu.ac.ir/article_11906.html?lang=en [In Persian]
Khateri, Z., Najarzadeh, R., & Agheli-Kohnehshahri, L. (2021). The impact of economic sanctions on capital account in Iran. Quarterly Journal of Quantitative Economics, 18(3), 135–162. https://doi.org/10.22055/jqe.2019.29594.2085 [In Persian]
Kirilakha, A., Felbermayr, G., Syropoulos, C., Yalcin, E., & Yotov, Y. V. (2021). The global sanctions data base: An update that includes the years of the Trump presidency. School of Economics Working Paper Series 2021-10, LeBow College of Business, Drexel University, Philadelphia.
Kiumarthi, M., Ahmadi Shadmehri, M. T., Salimifar, M., & Abrishami, H. (2019). The impact of financial and energy sanctions on output gap in Iran. Iranian Journal of Economic Research, 24(79), 33–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.22054/ijer.2019.10887 [In Persian]
Kutlina-Dimitrova, Z. (2017). The economic impact of the Russian import ban: a CGE analysis. International Economics and Economic Policy, 14(4), 537–552.
Lektzian, D., & Patterson, D. (2015). Political cleavages and economic sanctions: The economic and political winners and losers of sanctions. International Studies Quarterly, 59(1), 46–58.
Lindsay, J. M. (1986). Trade sanctions as policy instruments: A re-examination. International Studies Quarterly, 30(2), 153–173.
Lofgren, H., Harris, R. L., & Robinson, S. (2002). A standard computable general equilibrium (CGE) model in GAMS. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
Mack, A., & Khan, A. (2000). The efficacy of UN sanctions. Security Dialogue, 31(3), 279–292.
Marzban, H., & Ostadzad, A. H. (2015). The impact of economic sanctions on gross domestic product and social welfare for Iran: Generalized stochastic growth model. Iranian Journal of Economic Research, 20(63), 37–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.22054/ijer.2015.4093 [In Persian]
McKenzie, G. W. (1983). Measuring economic welfare: New methods. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mesbahi, M., Asgharpour, H., Haghighat, J., Kazerooni, S. A., & Fallahi, F. (2017). Exchange rate pass-through into import price in Iran economy with emphasis on volatility of oil revenues (Nonlinear approach). Economic Modeling, 11(37), 77–100. http://eco.iaufb.ac.ir/article_592937.html [In Persian]
Mohammadikhabbazan, M., Sadeghi, H., & Sahabi, B. (2015). Challenges and opportunities of oil sanctions for Iranian economy. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 6(3), 177–187.
Nakhli, S. R., Rafat, M., Bakhshi Dastjerdi, R., & Rafei, M. (2020). A DSGE analysis of the effects of economic sanctions: Evidence from the central bank of Iran. Iranian Journal of Economic Studies, 9(1), 35–70.
Nguyen, T. T., & Do, M. H. (2021). Impact of economic sanctions and counter-sanctions on the Russian Federation’s trade. Economic Analysis and Policy, 71, 267–278.
Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries. (2017). Annual Statistical Bulletin.
Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries. (2020). Annual Statistical Bulletin.
Pape, R. A. (1997). Why economic sanctions do not work. International Security, 22(2), 90–136.
Peksen, D. (2019). When do imposed economic sanctions work? A critical review of the sanctions effectiveness literature. Defence and Peace Economics, 30(6), 635–647.
Peksen, D., & Drury, A. C. (2010). Coercive or corrosive: The negative impact of economic sanctions on democracy. International Interactions, 36(3), 240–264.
Pond, A. (2017). Economic sanctions and demand for protection. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 61(5), 1073–1094.
Saadat, R., Abounoori, E., Baky Hoskouei, M., & Zarea, M. H. (2017). The welfare effects of Iran’s accession to WTO in a DCGE framework. Iranian Journal of Trade Studies, 21(84), 131–168. http://pajooheshnameh.itsr.ir/article_28988.html?lang=en [In Persian]
Scarf, H. E., & Hansen, T. (1973). The computation of economic equilibria. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Shahraki, M., Behbudi, D., & Ghaderi, S. (2010). Investigation of the impact of household saving on investment and consumption in Iran (A CGE model). Quarterly Journal of Quantitative Economics (Former Economic Studies), 7(3), 67–94. https://jqe.scu.ac.ir/article_10645.html?lang=en [In Persian]
Shirazi, H., Azarbaiejani, K., & Sameti, M. (2016). The effect of economic sanctions on Iran’s exports. Iranian Economic Review, 20(1), 111–124.
Shoven, J. B., & Whalley, J. (1992). Applying general equilibrium. Cambridge University Press.
Siddig, K. H. A. (2011). From bilateral trade to multilateral pressure: A scenario of European Union relations with Sudan. Middle East Development Journal, 3(01), 55–73.
Tofigh, F., & Matin, S. (2017). The impact of oil sanctions on growth of Iranian economic sectors: Application of mixed variable input–output model. Quarterly Iranian Journal of Defense Economics, 1(2), 111–133. https://eghtesad.sndu.ac.ir/article_472.html?lang=en [In Persian]
Tuzova, Y., & Qayum, F. (2016). Global oil glut and sanctions: The impact on Putin’s Russia. Energy Policy, 90, 140–151.
Valadan Zarghani, E. (2018). Investigating the Effects of Iran’s Oil and Gas Industries’ Sanctions on the Macroeconomic Variables with the Emphasis on Confronting the Vulnerability of Oil Export Revenues. Journal of Eghtesad-e-Moghavemati Research, 3(5), 121–146. http://npem.islamicec.ir/En-Article/139803011836203010013 [In Persian]
Varian, H. R. (1992). Microeconomic analysis (3rd ed.). New York: Norton.
Wallensteen, P. (1968). Characteristics of economic sanctions. Journal of Peace Research, 5(3), 248–267.
Zare, M. H. (2020). Dynamic effects of tariff reduction on the value added in Iran’s main economic sectors. The Journal of Economic Policy, 12(23), 279–319. http://ep.yazd.ac.ir/article_1918.html?lang=en [In Persian]