نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استایار اقتصاد، گروه اقتصاد، دانشکده اقتصاد و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران.

2 استاد اقتصاد، گروه اقتصاد، دانشکده اقتصاد و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران.

3 کارشناسی ارشد اقتصاد، گروه اقتصاد، دانشکده اقتصاد و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران.

چکیده

مالیات اصلی ترین و پایدارترین منبع تامین مالی دولت است، اما دولت در اکثر کشورهای در حال توسعه برای تامین درآمدهای مالیاتی مورد نیاز خود با موانع نهادی و ساختاری مواجه است. بنابراین، بهبود کیفیت نهادی
می تواند منجر به اعتماد عمومی، کاهش فرار مالیاتی، افزایش درآمدهای مالیاتی دولت و در نهایت بهبود عملکردنظام  مالیاتی شود. بر این اساس، در این پژوهش ابتدا با استفاده از روش ـ علل چندگانه-آثارچندگانه
(MIMIC) فرآیند فرار مالیاتی برآورد شده است. سپس، تأثیر همزمان کیفیت نهادی و فرار مالیاتی بر عملکرد نظام مالیاتی در کشورهای منتخب MENA در دوره (2002-2017) با استفاده از روش داده‌های تابلویی تحلیل می‌شود. نتایج حاکی از آن است که کارایی و پاسخگویی دولت، نسبت ارزش افزوده بخش خدمات به صنعت (شاخص تبدیل ساختاری) در اقتصاد، سهم واردات کالا و خدمات در تولید ناخالص داخلی اثر مثبت و سهم ارزش افزوده بخش کشاورزی در تولید ناخالص داخلی تأثیر منفی بر عملکرد نظام مالیاتی داشته است. همچنین، فرار مالیاتی و اثرهمزمان فرار مالیاتی و نرخ رشد تولید ناخالص داخلی تأثیر معنی‌داری برعملکرد نظام مالیاتی نداشته­اند. بر این اساس، افزایش کارایی و پاسخگویی دولت زمینه مشارکت بیشتر عموم مردم در تأمین مالی هزینه­های دولت را فراهم می­کند و باعث می­شود تا ضمن کاهش فرار مالیاتی درآمدهای مالیاتی دولت افزایش یابد. همچنین، افزایش محدودیت‌های تجاری باعث گسترش اقتصاد زیرزمینی و افزایش واردات به صورت غیرقانونی و قاچاق و کاهش درآمدهای مالیاتی دولت می­شود.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Investigating the Simultaneous Impact of Institutional Quality and Tax Evasion on the Performance of the Tax System in Selected Mena Countries

نویسندگان [English]

  • hojjat izadkhasti 1
  • Ydollah dadgar 2
  • Pouria beygi 3

1 Assistant Professor of Economics, Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Political Science, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Professor of Economics, Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Political Science, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.

3 Master of Economics, Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Political Science, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.

چکیده [English]

EXTENDED ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
Tax is the main and most stable source of government funding, but governments in most developing countries face institutional and structural barriers, such as poor quality of governance and high levels of corruption, in providing tax revenues. Accordingly, strengthening government accountability and effectiveness can increase the willingness to pay taxes. The trust created in individuals as a result of improving the quality of governance leads to the timely receipt of tax revenues and this leads to strengthening the economic structure. Thus, improvements in institutional quality can lead to public confidence, reduced tax evasion, increased government tax revenues, and ultimately improved tax system performance. One of the important indicators of the tax system performance in different countries is the ratio of tax revenues to GDP in each country. Accordingly, a higher value of this index in a country indicates better performance of its tax system.
 
METHODOLOGY
In this study, the tax evasion trend is first estimated using Multiple Causes-Multiple Indicators (MIMIC) method. Finally, the simultaneous effect of institutional quality and tax evasion on the performance of the tax system of selected MENA countries in the period (2002-2007) is investigated using the panel data method. In the following, theoretical principles are used to specify the econometric model, in which simultaneous effects of government efficiency and accountability and tax evasion on the performance of the tax system in selected countries of Mena in the period (2017-2002) are discussed:
 (1)
Where, is the ratio of government tax revenues to GDP,  is growth rate of GDP, is value added ratio of services sector to value added of industry sector (structural conversion index), is the share of value added of agricultural sector in GDP, is the ratio of imports of goods and services To GDP, is the government efficiency index and  is the tax evasion index in the i-th country at time t and  is the error term. In the second model, the multiplier effects of tax evasion and GDP growth on the ratio of government tax revenues to GDP are examined:
   (2)
 
FINDINGS
Increasing government efficiency and accountability paves the way for greater public participation in financing government expenditures and increases government tax revenues while reducing tax evasion. Also, increasing trade restrictions expand the underground economy, increase illegal imports and smuggling, and reduce government tax revenues. Also, structural transformation, as a representative of the change in the composition of economic sectors, affects the government's ability to collect taxes, the composition and type of taxes it can impose on the economy.
 
CONCLUSION
The results show that improving the quality of governance leads to a reduction in tax evasion. Also, the results show that government efficiency and accountability, structural transformation in the economy, the share of imports of goods and services in GDP have a positive effect but the share of value added in agriculture in GDP has a negative effect on the ratio of tax revenues to GDP. In addition, the effect of tax evasion and the multiplier effect of tax evasion and GDP growth rate on the ratio of tax revenues to GDP are not significant.  
 
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Institutional Quality
  • Good Governance
  • Tax Evasion
  • Tax System Performance
  • Panel Data
Acemoglu, D., Verdier, T., & Acemoglu, T. V. (2000). The choice between market failure and corruption.” American Economic Review, 90 (1): 194-211.##Ajaz, T., & Ahmad, E. (2010). The effect of corruption and governance on tax revenues. The Pakistan Development Review, 49(4): 405-417. ##Alm, J. (2012). Measuring, explaining, and controlling tax evasion: lessons from theory, experiments, and field studies. International tax and public finance, 19(1): 54-77.‏ ##Bayer, R. C., & Sutter, M. (2009). The Excess Burden of Tax Evasion an Experimental Detection–Concealment Contest. European Economic Review, 53(5), 527-543. ##Besley, T., & Persson, T. (2014). Why do developing countries tax so little?. Journal of economic perspectives, 28(4), 99-120. ##Bird, A. and Stephan, A. (2015). Governance and taxes: Evidence from regression discontinuity. Journal of Economic Issues, 5(3): 12-17. ##Botlhole, T.D. (2010). Tax Effort and Determinants of Tax Ratio in Sub-Saharan Africa, International Conference on Applied Economics, ICOAE. ##Boussaidi, A., and Hamed, M. S. (2015). The impact of governance mechanisms on tax aggressiveness: empirical evidence from Tunisian context. Journal of Asian Business Strategy, 5(1): 1–12. ##Cebula, R.J. & Saadatmand, Y. (2005). Income Tax Evasion Determinants: New Evidence. Journal of American Academy of Business, 7(2): 1-24. ##Cevik, S., Gottschalk, J., Hutton, E., Jaramillo, L., Karnane, P., & Sow, M. (2019). Structural transformation and tax efficiency. International Finance. ##Chu, H, Lai, C.C., & Cheng, C.C., (2015). Tax havens, growth and wlfare, Journal of public economic theory, 17(6): 802-823. ##Dell’Anno, R., Gómez, M. & Pardo, A. (2004). Shadow Economy in Three Very Different Mediterranean Countries: France, Spain and Greece. A MIMIC Approach. Working Paper 2004:1-29. ##Eltony, M. N. (2002). Determinants of Tax Efforts in Arab Countries, Arab Planning Institute Working Paper 207. ##Ghani, Z. (2011). A cross country analysis of tax performance with special focus on Pakistan´ s tax effort. Journal of Economic Issues, 11(1): 1-25. ##Gupta, A. (2007). Determinants of tax revenue efforts in developing countries. IMF Working Papers, No. 07/184 Washington, DC: The International Monetary Fund Organization for Economic, 1-39. ##Imam, P. A., and Jacobs, D. (2007). Effect of corruption on tax revenues in the Middle East, Review of Middle East Economics and Finance Rev, Middle East Econ. Fin., 10(1): 1-24. ##Karagoz, K. (2013). Determinants of Tax Revenue: Does Sectorial Composition Matter?, Journal of Finance, Accounting and Management, 4(2): 50-63. ##Khani, A, Imani, K. and Yousefi, A. (2014). Tax Avoidance, how it is Measured and the Factors Affecting it, Accounting Research, 15:121-142. ##Izadkhasti, H. (2016). Analyzing the Effects of Corruption and Quality of Governance on Tax System Performance: A Dynamic Panel Data Approach. Economic Development Policy, 4(1), 93-118. doi: 10.22051/edp.2017.13453.1069.  [in Persion] ##Izadkhasti, H. (2019). Analyzing the Impact of Governance Quality and Composition of Government Expenditures on Iran's Economic Growth: Endogenous Growth Approach, Quartely Journal of Quantitative Economics (JQE), 15(4), 135-165. https://jqe.scu.ac.ir/article_14146.  [in Persion] ## Karimi Petanlar, S., Gilak Hakimabadi, M. T., & Nochamani., S. (2015). The effect of government effectiveness on reducing tax evasion in selected countries, Tax Research Journal, 23 (27), 63-91. https://taxjournal.ir/index.php  [in Persion] ##Mohammadzadeh, Y., Hekmatifard, S., & Sharifi, E. (2017). The effect of government size on good governance and economic performance in selected countries, Economic Growth and Development Research, 7(26), 97-112. https://egdr.journals.pnu.ac.ir/article_2595 [in Persion] ##Mongong-Fon, R., Filippaios, F., Mohr, A. T., & Batsakis, G. (2017). The roles of institutional quality and institutional distance in explaining North-South and South-South FDI: The case of foreign direct investment into Africa. Journal of International Business Studies, ISSN 0047-2506. ## Motalebi, M., Alizadeh, M., & Faraji Dizaji., S. (2020). Estimating the shadow economy and tax evasion by considering behavioral factors, Quartely Journal of Quantitative Economics (JQE), 16 (4), 69-100. https://aes.basu.ac.ir/article_2419  [in Persion] ##Mutascu, M. (2011). Influence of clime conditions on tax revenues. MPRA (Munich Personal RePEc Archive) Paper, No. 40324. ##Prinz, A. L. (2018). How Should One Study Clandestine Activities: Crimes, Tax Fraud, and Other “Dark” Economic Behavior?. Agent‐based Modeling of Tax Evasion: Theoretical Aspects and Computational Simulations, 37-58. ##Rezagholizadeh, M., Aghaei, M., & Alemi, A. H. (2019). Analysis of tax evasion in Iran by multiple index method - multiple causes, Quarterly Journal of Parliament and Strategy, 26 (97), 199-226. https://nashr.majles.ir/article_301  [in Persion] ##Richardson, G. (2006). Determinants of Tax Evasion: a Cross-Country Investigation, Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 15: 150-169. ##Richardson, G. (2008). The Relationship between Culture and Tax Evasion across Countries: Additional Evidence and Extensions. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 17 (2): 67–78. ## Sadeghi, M. S., & Nourani, F. (2015). An overview of the challenges and strategies to prevent tax evasion in Iran. 3rd International Conference on Applied Research in Management and Accounting, Tehran, Shahid Beheshti University, 5-20. https://civilica.com  [in Persion] ##Sadraei, S. (2017), An Introduction to the Theoretical Foundations of Good Governance (A Comparative Study of the Governance Situation in the UAE and Bahrain), Journal of Nations Research, 2)19(, 45-67. http://ensani.ir/fa/article/373688/  [in Persion] ##Samadi, A. H., & Tabandeh, R. (2013). Tax evasion in Iran (study of causes and effects and its estimation), Tax Research Journal, 21 (19), 77-107. http://taxjournal.ir/article-1-196-fa.html [in Persion] ##Sanyal, A., Gang, I. N., and Goswami, O. (2000) Corruption, Tax Evasion and the Laffer Curve,  Public Choice, Springer 105(1-2): 61–78. ##Schneider, F. & Savasan, F. (2007). DYMIMIC Estimates of the Size of Shadow Economies of Turkey and Neighboring Countries. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 9:126-144. ## Sepehrdoost, H., Rajabi, F., & Barouti, M. (2015). Investigating the effect of good governance on the revenue performance of the tax system. Quarterly Journal of Applied Theories of Economics, Second Year, 2, 103-126. https://ecoj.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_4269  [in Persion] ##Shahabadi, A., Ganji, M. (2015). The effect of good governance on economic freedom of selected countries in Mena region. Regional Economics and Development, 9, 264-288. https://erd.um.ac.ir/article_25577 [in Persion] ##Shneider, F. and Enste, D. (2000). Shadow Economics Around the World: Size, Causes, and Consequences, Journal of Economic Literature, 38 (1): 77-114. ##Tabandeh, R, Jusoh, M, Md. Nor, N.G, and Shah Ziadi, M.A. (2012). Estimating Factors Affecting Tax Evasion In Malaysia: A Neural Network Method Analysis, Prosiding perker, 2: 1524-1535. ##Tahseen, A, Eatzaz, A. (2010). The Effect of Corruption and Governance on Tax   Revenues, the Pakistan Development Review, 49(4): 405-417. ##Tanzi, V. and Zee, H. (2000). Tax policy for Emerging Markets: Developing Countries. Washington, DC: IMF Working Paper WP/00/35. ##Tanzi, V., and Davoodi, H. R. (2000). Corruption, growth, and public finances. IMF Working paper.