Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Associate Professor of Economics, Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran.

2 ** Master of Science in Economics Science, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran

3 Master of Science in Energy Economics, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran.

Abstract

EXTENDED ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
In recent decades, the industrialization of countries has been one of the main factors for the increase of greenhouse gas emissions, which has led to severe environmental damage such as global warming, temperature inversion. In addition, the increase of environmental pollutants may have a negative impact on the health of individuals in the long run, thus increasing government health expenditures. In addition to the various factors affecting greenhouse gas emissions, globalization (economic, social, and political) can also affect the environment through various channels. For example, economic globalization affects the environment through the channels of income, composition, and technology. Moreover, social globalization can change the state of the environment through the media, the principle of mental distance, transportation, and access to knowledge and international events. Political globalization may also have an impact on the environment through the efficiency of intergovernmental organizations and international treaties. Considering the possible role of globalization (economic, social, and political) on the environment, this study attempts to investigate the relationship between globalization (economic, social, and political) and carbon dioxide emissions in Iran during 1979-2017 based on the Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) approach. Moreover, this study tests the hypothesis of Martens et al. (2015) about the effectiveness of the globalization index results in terms of components (de facto and de jure). For further clarification, the study examines the above hypothesis using the three dimensions of economic, social, and political. In addition, the KOF Globalization Index is used, which consists of three dimensions: Economic, Social and Political, and each of the dimensions has two de facto and de jure components. Clearly, the impact of each of these dimensions of globalization and its components on the emission of environmental pollutants may be different. It should also be noted that the two de facto and de jure components in the KOF Globalization Index are known as a new classification introduced by Martens et al. (2015).
 
METHODOLOGY
As mentioned in the introduction, the aim of this study is to analyze the effect of globalization on pollution in Iran. In order to make a comprehensive analysis, the dimensions (economic, social and political) and components (de facto and de jure) of globalization are also utilized. According to the theoretical and experimental studies, the regression model is specified in two formats, one is based on the dimensions of globalization (economic, social, and political) and the other is based on the components of globalization (de facto and de jure).

First model: the effect of globalization at the level of j on environmental pollution

The basis of the first model is the regression equation in equation ‎(1). EP represents the logarithm of carbon dioxide emissions. EC represents the logarithm of energy consumption, Pop represents the logarithm of population, GDP and GDP2 represent the logarithm of real gross domestic product and its square, respectively. In addition, Gloj represents the logarithm of the globalization index at level j, including total (T), economic (E), social (S), and political (P).

                

Based on equation (1), the ARDL(p,q,r,s,t,u) model is designed in the form of equation ‎(2). In this regard,  is the coefficient of autocorrelation,  is the coefficient of globalization index intervals; And  to  are coefficients of interruptions of energy consumption, real GDP, square of real GDP and population, respectively.

                                                         

Based on equation ‎(2), the error correction model and long-run coefficients in the form of equation ‎(3) is specified as follows:

                             


Second model: the effect of Components of globalization at the level of j on environmental pollution

The basis of the model in this format is the regression equation in equation ‎(4), where GloDeFaj and GloDeJej are respectively the logarithm of the de facto and de jure globalization indexes at level j.

 

Similarly, based on equation ‎(4), the ARDL(p,q,r,s,t,u,v) model is designed in the form of equation ‎(5), where θ_1j and θ_2j are the coefficients of de facto and de jure globalization index at level j, respectively.

 

Based on equation ‎(5), the model of error correction and long-run coefficients is specified in the form of equation ‎(6) as follows:

 

 
CONCLUSION and POLICY REMARKS
The results of the data descriptions show that the dimensions and components of the globalization index have different trends, and carbon dioxide emissions have had an increasing trend since Iran's Islamic Revolution. The estimation results of the models indicate that the economic and social globalization indices have a positive effect on carbon dioxide emissions in the short term. Moreover, the de facto component of total and economic globalization has a negative effect on CO2 emissions. Furthermore, the de facto component of the social and political globalization index has a positive effect on carbon dioxide emissions, while the de facto component of total and economic globalization with a one-year lag has a positive effect on carbon dioxide emissions. In the long run, the total globalization index has no significant effect on carbon dioxide emissions, but two dimensions of social and economic globalization have a direct effect on carbon dioxide emissions. Besides, the de jure component of the total globalization index and the de jure component of the economic, social, and political dimensions directly affect carbon dioxide emissions, but the de facto component of the total and economic globalization index has a reverse effect on carbon dioxide emissions. Moreover, energy consumption and population have a direct effect on CO2 emissions, and the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) hypothesis cannot be rejected in Iran. The hypothesis of Martens et al. (2015) is also not rejected in this study.
On this basis, it is suggested that economic, social, and political decision-makers pay attention to the negative environmental impacts of the de jure component of economic, social, and political globalization and take action to optimize the environmental impacts of the de jure component of each of the three dimensions by looking closely at each of the sub-dimensions. Moreover, considering the favorable effect of the de facto component of economic globalization on the environment, it is better to give higher priority to economic globalization from a de facto point of view than to economic globalization from a de jure one, so that the Iranian economy can benefit from the advantages of globalization in the field of economy, as well as the environment can be spared from the damages caused by the expansion of the economy.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Ahmadian, M., Abdoli, G., Jabalameli, F., Shabankhah, M., & Khorasani, S. A. (2019). Extracting The Dynamic Curve of the Kuznets Environment. Quarterly Journal of Quantitative Economics(JQE), 16(2), 1-36. doi: 10.22055/jqe.2019.25839.1873.
Baek, J., Cho, Y., & Koo, W. W. (2009). The environmental consequences of globalization: A country-specific time-series analysis. Ecological economics, 68(8-9), 2255-2264.
Bu, M., Lin, C. T., & Zhang, B. (2016). Globalization and climate change: new empirical panel data evidence. Journal of Economic Surveys, 30(3), 577-595.
Chen, T., Gozgor, G., Koo, C. K., & Lau, C. K. M. (2020). Does international cooperation affect CO 2 emissions? Evidence from OECD countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 1-9.
Cole, M. A. (2006). Does trade liberalization increase national energy use?. Economics Letters, 92(1), 108-112.
Copeland, B. R., & Taylor, M. S. (2004). Trade, growth, and the environment. Journal of Economic literature, 42(1), 7-71.
Destek, M. A. (2019). Investigation on the role of economic, social, and political globalization on environment: evidence from CEECs. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 1-14.
Dinda, S. (2004). Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: a survey. Ecological economics, 49(4), 431-455.
Dreher, A. (2006). Does globalization affect growth? Evidence from a new index of globalization. Applied economics, 38(10), 1091-1110.
Gygli, S., Haelg, F., Potrafke, N., & Sturm, J. E. (2019). The KOF globalisation index–revisited. The Review of International Organizations, 14(3), 543-574.
Haseeb, A., Xia, E., Baloch, M. A., & Abbas, K. (2018). Financial development, globalization, and CO 2 emission in the presence of EKC: evidence from BRICS countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(31), 31283-31296.
Hosseini Yazdi, S. S., Emadzadeh, M., & Daei-Karimzadeh, S. (2022). Globalization, Human Capital Accumulation and Economic Growth in selected Developed and Developing Countries. Quarterly Journal of Quantitative Economics (JQE), 19(2), 111-150. doi: 10.22055/jqe.2020.32690.2222.
Khan, D., & Ullah, A. (2019). Testing the relationship between globalization and carbon dioxide emissions in Pakistan: does environmental Kuznets curve exist?. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(15), 15194-15208.
Koengkan, M., Fuinhas, J. A., & Santiago, R. (2019). Asymmetric impacts of globalisation on CO 2 emissions of countries in Latin America and the Caribbean. Environment Systems and Decisions, 1-13.
Leal, P. H., & Marques, A. C. (2019). Are de jure and de facto globalization undermining the environment? Evidence from high and low globalized EU countries. Journal of environmental management, 250, 1-12.
Lv, Z., & Xu, T. (2018). Is economic globalization good or bad for the environmental quality? New evidence from dynamic heterogeneous panel models. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 137, 340-343.
Martens, P., Caselli, M., De Lombaerde, P., Figge, L., & Scholte, J. A. (2015). New directions in globalization indices. Globalizations, 12(2), 217-228.
Mishkin, F. S. (2009). Globalization and financial development. Journal of development Economics, 89(2), 164-169.
Motoshita, M., Sakagami, M., Kudoh, Y., Tahara, K., & Inaba, A. (2015). Potential impacts of information disclosure designed to motivate Japanese consumers to reduce carbon dioxide emissions on choice of shopping method for daily foods and drinks. Journal of Cleaner Production, 101, 205-214.
Mousavi, S., Niazi, N., Farajzadeh, Z. (2013). Effects of Globalization on Pollution diffusion in Iran. Agricultural Economics Research, 5(2), 75-90 (In Persian).
Rahman, M. M. (2020). Environmental degradation: The role of electricity consumption, economic growth and globalisation. Journal of environmental management, 253, 109742-109750.
Rahman, S. U., Chen, S., Saud, S., Bano, S., & Haseeb, A. (2019). The nexus between financial development, globalization, and environmental degradation: Fresh evidence from Central and Eastern European Countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(24), 24733-24747.
Rennen, W., & Martens, P. (2003). The globalisation timeline. Integrated Assessment, 4(3), 137-144.
Salahuddin, M., Ali, M. I., Vink, N., & Gow, J. (2019). The effects of urbanization and globalization on CO 2 emissions: evidence from the Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(3), 2699-2709.
Samimi, J., Gholami, Z. (2018). Economic Globalization and Environmental Performance in Developing Countries. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology (In Persian). Doi: 10.22034/jest.2018.9960.1851
Shahbaz, M., Khan, S., Ali, A., & Bhattacharya, M. (2017). The impact of globalization on CO2 emissions in China. The Singapore Economic Review, 62(04), 929-957.
Shahbaz, M., Mallick, H., Mahalik, M. K., & Loganathan, N. (2015). Does globalization impede environmental quality in India?. Ecological Indicators, 52, 379-393.
Shahbaz, M., Mallick, H., Mahalik, M. K., & Sadorsky, P. (2016). The role of globalization on the recent evolution of energy demand in India: Implications for sustainable development. Energy Economics, 55, 52-68.
Shahbaz, M., Nasreen, S., Ahmed, K., & Hammoudeh, S. (2017). Trade openness–carbon emissions nexus: the importance of turning points of trade openness for country panels. Energy Economics, 61, 221-232.
Sitaraman, S. (2006). Regulating the environment: Assessing China's domestic environmental law and participation in international treaties. China Review, 183-196.
Spilker, G. (2012). Helpful organizations: membership in inter-governmental organizations and environmental quality in developing countries. British Journal of Political Science, 42(2), 345-370.
Twerefou, D. K., Danso-Mensah, K., & Bokpin, G. A. (2017). The environmental effects of economic growth and globalization in Sub-Saharan Africa: A panel general method of moments approach. Research in International Business and Finance, 42, 939-949.
Usman, O., Olanipekun, I. O., Iorember, P. T., & Abu-Goodman, M. (2020). Modelling environmental degradation in South Africa: the effects of energy consumption, democracy, and globalization using innovation accounting tests. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 1-16.
Wang, Z., Rasool, Y., Asghar, M. M., & Wang, B. (2019). Dynamic linkages among CO 2 emissions, human development, financial development, and globalization: empirical evidence based on PMG long-run panel estimation. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(36), 36248-36263.
Xu, Z., Baloch, M. A., Meng, F., Zhang, J., & Mahmood, Z. (2018). Nexus between financial development and CO 2 emissions in Saudi Arabia: analyzing the role of globalization. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(28), 28378-28390.
You, W., & Lv, Z. (2018). Spillover effects of economic globalization on CO2 emissions: a spatial panel approach. Energy Economics, 73, 248-257.
Zafar, M. W., Saud, S., & Hou, F. (2019). The impact of globalization and financial development on environmental quality: evidence from selected countries in the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(13), 13246-13262.