Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Assistant Professor of Economics, Faculty of Social Sciences, Economics and Entrepreneurship, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran.

2 Associate Professor of Economics, Faculty of Social Sciences, Economics and Entrepreneurship, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran.

3 Ph.D. student in urban and regional economic, Faculty of Social Sciences, Economics and Entrepreneurship, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION
Poverty is a fundamental multidimensional phenomenon which has always been and is one of the most important detriments to societies and the root of the problems and hindrances of most parts of the world. Efforts to eliminate this social problem are one of the most prominent goals of economic growth and development; and despite economic growth in underdeveloped or developing countries, this problem persists. .Although growth in income, as one of the macroeconomic variables, has a significant effect on poverty and its reduction, but the existence of inequality and its effect on economic growth plays an important role in benefiting the poor from economic growth. In the process of economic growth, what reduces poverty is an increase in household income; thus, the distribution of income among households should be such that the poor also benefit from this growth. Therefore, economic growth is not sufficient to eliminate poverty on its own, and its effect on poverty is not the same at different times and places, and the manner in which the benefits of growth are distributed is significant as well. Inequality and poverty are two completely different concepts, but they are deeply related. Therefore, paying attention to economic growth and reducing inequality can have good results in reducing poverty. In recent decades, societies that have focused on both economic growth and reducing inequality have been much more successful in reducing poverty. In this regard, to understand the effects of economic growth on poverty, it is necessary to distinguish between the effects of economic growth on poverty and the effect of inequality on poverty. Then, the change in the poverty index is broken down into a change in average incomes and changes in income inequality to properly determine the contribution of income and inequality in poverty decrease.
 
METHODOLOGY
in the present study, the effects of income and inequality and their resultant on reducing poverty in the provinces of Iran over a fourteen-year period, from 2004 to 2018, have been determined using the Sen Index, the Kakwani method, and various mathematical methods.
 
FINDINGS
As confirmed by our study results, both income effects and inequality effects had performed in favor of the impoverished in the province of Yazd and led to poverty reduction, while in Kermanshah, Khorasan Razavi, Isfahan, and Zanjan the income effects and inequality effects have somewhat neutralized one another. In other words, even though the increase in the average income reduced poverty, the increased inequality led to increased poverty. On the other hand, the situation in the province of Alborz was considerably different. In this province, although decreasing the average income increased poverty, the improvement in income distribution not only eliminated the negative effects of the income share, but also reduced poverty. However, the income effects and inequality effects had moved in the same direction in Gilan, Khuzestan, Fars, Hamedan, Chaharmahal & Bakhtiari, Lorestan, Tehran, Qom, North Khorasan, and Sistan and Baluchestan, to increase poverty. Finally, in other provinces, the distribution of income has changed in a way that despite the increase in average incomes, poverty increased.
 
CONCLUSION
Therefore, as the research findings show, poverty has decreased in only a few provinces during the period under review. And the inequality effects and the income effects, or both, have led to increased poverty. Therefore, in order to reduce poverty, economic growth and reduce inequality must be given much attention.
 

Keywords

Main Subjects

Afghah, S., & Ghanavatifar, T. (2009). Measurement of Poverty Intensity in Khuzestan Province During 1997-2006. Journal of economy and regional development, 6(21), 111-126. (in Persian)## Ashraf, S., Behbudi, D., Vaez Mahdavi, M., & Panahi, H. (2019). The Triangular Relationship between Poverty, Inequality and Growth in Iran during the Development Plans. Social Welfare Quarterly, Vol 18, winter 2018, No 71. (in Persian) ##Behboudi, D., Alaei hydranlv, M., Panahi, H. (2020). Measuring and Comparing the Degree of Pro-Poor Growth in Islamic Countries oach. Quarterly Journal of Quantitative Economics, 17(3), 91-115. doi: 10.22055/jqe.2019.28419.2028. (in Persian) ##Besley, T., Burgess, R., & Esteve-Volart, B. (2004). Operationalizing Pro-Poor Growth: A Case Study on India. Prepared as part of the Operationalizing Pro-Poor Growth research program. Processed. World Bank, Washington, DC. ##Bourguignon, François (2004) : The Poverty-growth-inequality triangle, Working Paper, No. 125, Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations (ICRIER), New Delhi. ##Foster, J., Greer, J., & Thorbecke, E. (1984). Notes and comments a class of decomposable poverty measure. Econometrica, Vol. 52 No##Jmurova, A. (2017). Pro-Poor Growth: Definition Measurement and Policy Issues. Munich Personal RePEc Archive Paper No.85397. ##Kakwani, N. and H. Son. 2008. Poverty Equivalent Growth Rate. Review of Incomeand Wealth, 54(4): 643–655. ##Kakwani, N., &E. Pernia. (2000). What Is Pro-Poor Growth?. Asian Development Review, Vol.18 No.1 pp.1-16 ref.14##Kakwani, N., Khandker, S., & Son, H. (2004). Pro-poor Growth: Concepts and Measurements with Country Case Studies.  UNDP International Poverty Center, IPC Working Paper No 1##Karimi, M., Delangizan, S., & Heshmati Dayari E. (2018). Pro-Poor Growth In Selected Iranian Provinces. quartery journal of Economic Research and Policies, Volume 26, Issue 85. (in Persian) ##Karimi, M., Delangizan, S., & Heshmati Dayari E. (2018). Pro-Poor Growth: Noor elm published. (in Persian) ##LoBue, M., & Palmisano, F. (2019). The individual Pverty Incidence of growth. Wider Working Paper, Vol.82, No.6, PP1295-1331. ##Mansouri, S., & Afgheh, S. (2018). The Dynamic Estimating Poverty line of Urban Income groups by Using Extended Linear Expenditure System (ELES) (Panel data Approach). Quarterly Journal of Quantitative Economics, 15(1), 63-85. (in Persian) ##Momeni, F., Yousefi, M., & Mobarak, A. (2010). Determinants of Growth, Labour Productivity and Poverty in Rural Areas of Iran. Journal of Rural Research, 1(1), 99-121. (in Persian) ##Parvin, S. (2015). The Role of Middle Class in Economic Growth. Economics Research, 15(56), 1-42. (in Persian) ##Raghfar, H., Babapour, M., & Yazdanpanah, M. (2016). Survey on the Relationship between Economic Growth, Poverty, and Inequality in Iran during Five-Year Development Plan. Journal of Applied Economics Studies in Iran, 4(16), 59-79. (in Persian) ##Ravallion, M., & Chen, S. (2003). Measuring pro-poor growth. Economic Letters, Vol.78, No.1, PP.93-99. ##Sharifinia, Z., Moshiri, R., & Alihosseini, A. (2010). The Role of Rural Poverty on Sustainable Development (Destroying the Environment: Pasture) Case Study: Poshteab District of the Township of Zabol. territory, 7(No 26), 15-30. (in Persian) ##Thorbecke, E., Foster, J., & Greer, J. (1984). Notes and Comments: A Class of Decomposable Poverty Measures. Econometrica, 52, 761-765. ##Timmer, P. (2018). Pro-Poor Growth in Indonesia. Wider Working Paper 2018/103. ##Todaro, M.P., Smith, S.C., (2011). Economic Development (11th Edition). The Pearson Series in Economics - Prentice Hall##