نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 Phd candidate in University of Isfahan

2 Professor, Biology Department, Towson University

3 Professor, Economic Department, University of Isfahan

چکیده

An economic system is comprised of different primary flows that can be captured in macroeconomic models with complex network relations. Theoretically and empirically in this system, weak substitution or complementarity of environmental materials, like energy and other production factors such as capital, is undeniable. This is an effective critique on neoclassical economics. In this paper, we view the economy as a complex thermodynamic system in order to calculate the entropy generation, specifically the trend in entropy production in Iran over time. Entropy can be measured as the amount of waste and pollution produced by a system based on Georgescu-Rogen’s view. Using a conceptual model, we show the basic flows in a macroeconomic network (government, households, firms and financial sector), by focusing on the amount of wastes and other entropy generators and show how to calculate the overall entropy for an economic system. Furthermore, we demonstrate this approach using a mathematical model and literature from ecology and macroeconomics with the Iranian economy as a case study. Finally, by using statistical data from the World Bank, we show the three important indices of a system, growth, development and entropy values that increased in Iran during 1970–2014. As it is shown in results, the economic entropy of Iran is increasing.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Measuring System Entropy Generation in a Complex Economic Network (The Case of Iran)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Behrouz Sadeghi Amroabadi 1
  • Brian D. Fath 2
  • Mohsen Renani 3

1 Phd candidate in University of Isfahan

2 Professor, Biology Department, Towson University

3 Professor, Economic Department, Isfahan University

چکیده [English]

An economic system is comprised of different primary flows that can be captured in macroeconomic models with complex network relations. Theoretically and empirically in this system, weak substitution or complementarity of environmental materials, like energy and other production factors such as capital, is undeniable. This is an effective critique on neoclassical economics. In this paper, we view the economy as a complex thermodynamic system in order to calculate the entropy generation, specifically the trend in entropy production in Iran over time. Entropy can be measured as the amount of waste and pollution produced by a system based on Georgescu-Rogen’s view. Using a conceptual model, we show the basic flows in a macroeconomic network (government, households, firms and financial sector), by focusing on the amount of wastes and other entropy generators and show how to calculate the overall entropy for an economic system. Furthermore, we demonstrate this approach using a mathematical model and literature from ecology and macroeconomics with the Iranian economy as a case study. Finally, by using statistical data from the World Bank, we show the three important indices of a system, growth, development and entropy values that increased in Iran during 1970–2014. As it is shown in results, the economic entropy of Iran is increasing.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Economic Entropy
  • Complex system
  • Thermodynamics
  • Macroeconomic
  • Network
Ackerman, F. & L. Heinzerling. (2002). Pricing the Priceless: Cost–Benefit Analysis of Environmental Protection. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 150(5): 1553–1584. ## Ackerman, F. & L. Heinzerling. (2003). Priceless: Human Health, the Environment, and the Limits of the Market. The New Press. ## Ayres, R.U. (1998). Exergy, Waste Accounting, and Life-Cycle Analysis .Energy, 23(5): 355–363. ## Ayres, R.U. (2004). On the Life Cycle Metaphor: Where Ecology and Economics Diverge. Ecological Economics, 48(4): 425-438. ## Barro, R.J. & X.Sala-i-Martin. (2003). Economic Growth. 2nd Edition. The MIT Press, Cambridge. MA. ## Baumgärtner, S. (2005). Temporal and Thermodynamic Irreversibility in Production Theory // Economic Theory, 26: 725–728. ## Baumol, W. J., W. E. Oates, V.S. Bawa & D. Bradford. (1994). The Theory of Environmental Policy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. ## Cabrales, A., Gossner, O. & R. Serrano. (2010). Entropy and the Value of Information for Investors Entropy and Information Theory, First Edition, Corrected. ## Ciegis, R. (2004). Concepts of Strong Comparability and Commensurability versus Concepts of Strong and Weak Sustainability. Inžinerineekonomika, 5(45): 31–35. ## Costantini, V. & P. Elena. (2014). Elasticity of Substitution in Capital-Energy Relationships: How Central is a Sector-Based Panel Estimation Approach? SEEDS WP. 13: 52-80. ## Costanza R. & H.E. Daly. (1992). Natural Capital & Sustainable Development. Conservation Biology, 6: 37-46. ## Crowell, B., (2007). Simple Nature, Light and Matter, California, ## Daly, H.E. (1973). Toward a Steady-State Economy. San-Francisko. ## Daly, H.E. (1995). On Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen's Contributions to Economics: An Obituary Essay. Ecological Economics, 13: 149–154. ## Daly, H.E. (2005). Economics in a Full World. Scientific American Journal, 33: 101–124. ## DE PASCALE, A. (2012). Role of Entropy in Sustainable Economic Growth, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, 2: 293-301. ## Domingos, T. S. (2006). Is Neoclassical Microeconomics Formally Valid? An Approach Based on an Analogy with Equilibrium Thermodynamics. Ecological Economics, 58(1): 160–169. ## Eriksson, K.E. (1991). Physical Foundations of Ecological Economics, Goteborg: University of Goteborg Press. ## Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1971). The Entropy Law and The Economic Process, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. ## Gong, M. (2001). An Exergy and Sustainable Development-Part2: Indicators and Methods. Exergy International Journal, 1(4): 217–233. ## Haller, S.A. & Hyland, M. (2014). Capital–Energy Substitution: Evidence from a Panel of Irish Manufacturing Firms. Energy Economics 45: 501–510. ## Heilbroner, R.L. & L.C. Thurow. (1982). Economics Explained, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J. ## Hotelling, H. (1931). The Economics of Exhaustible Resources’, Journal of Political Economy. 39: 137–175. ## Huang, J. & R. E. Ulanowicz. (2014). Ecological Network Analysis for Economic Systems: Growth and Development and Implications for Sustainable Development. PloS one 9(6): 100-121. ## Joergensen, R. & F. Mueller. (2015). Handbook of Ecosystem Theories and Management. Lewis Publications, Boca Raton. ## Joon, K., J. Yun, H. Kwon & J. Chun. (2011). First Step Toward Bridging Ecological and Socio-Economic Systems: Linking Thermodynamics, Complexity, and Sustainability. Terreco Science Conference. ## Jørgensen, S.V. & B. D. Fath. (2004). Application of Thermodynamic Principles in Ecology. Ecological Complexity. 1: 267–280. ## Kondepudi, D. (1998). Modern Thermodynamics: From Heat Engines to Dissipative Structures / D.Kondepudi, I.Prigogine. Chichester: Wiley. ## Krysiak, F. C. (2006). Entropy, limits To Growth, and the Prospects for Weak Sustainability // Ecological Economics, 58(1): 182–191. ## Martin, M. & A. Parsapour. (2012). Upcycling Wastes With Biogas Production: An Exergy and Economic Analysis Venice, Fourth International Symposium on Energy from Biomass and Waste. ## Miao, D.S. (2007). The System Science University Speech. Renmin University of China Press, Beijing. ## Ortiz-Cruz, A., E. Rodriguez, C. Ibarra-Valdez & J. Alvarez-Ramirez. (2012). Efficiency of Crude Oil Markets: Evidences from Informational Entropy Analysis, Energy Policy, 41: 365–373. ## Pearce, D.W. & G.D. Atkinson. (1993). Capital Theory and the Measure of Sustainable Development: An indicator of “weak” sustainability. Ecological Economics. 8: 103–108. ## Philippe, A. & P. Howitt. (1998). Endogenous Growth Theory. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. ## Romer, P.M. (1994). The Origins of Endogenous Growth. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 8 (1): 3- 22. ## Rosen, M.A. (2002). Assessing Energy Technologies and Environmental Impacts With Principles of Thermodynamics. Applied Energy, 72: 427–441. ## Ruth, M. (2007). Entropy, Economics, and Policy. Artec-paper .140: 16134907. ## Scharler, U. M. (2008). Ecological Network Analysis, Ascendency. Systems Ecology, Ecological Network Analysis, Ascendency.p1064. University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa. ## Shuo, L., Ch. Yiying, Z. Zexin & L. Wenbin. (2013). the Analysis for SmallWorld Network's Evolution Based on Network Entropy. AASRI Conference on Parallel and Distributed Computing and Systems. ## Solow, R.M. (1997). Georgescu-Roegen Versus Solow/Stiglitz. Ecological Economics, 22: 267–268. ## Sorrell, S. (2014). Energy Substitution, Technical Change and Rebound Effects, Energies, 15: 1996-1073, www.mdpi.com/journal/energies ## Svirezhev, Y.M. (2000). Thermodynamics and Ecology” Ecological Modelling .132: 11–22 ## Tovar, M.A., E.M. Iglesias. (2013). Capital-Energy Relationships: An Analysis When Disaggregatingby Industry and Different Types Of Capital. Energy J. 34: 129–150. ## Ulanowicz, R.E. (1986). Growth and development: Ecosystems Phenomenology. New York: Springer-Verlag. 203. ## Ulanowicz, R. E. (2000). Ascendency: A measure of Ecosystem Performance. 14: 303-315. ## Ulanowicz, R.E., S.J. Goerner, B. Lietaer, R. Gomez. (2009). Quantifying Sustainability: Resilience, Efficiency and The Return of Information Theory. Ecological Complexity. 6: 27–36. ## Wall, G. (2010). On Exergy and Sustainable Development in Environmental Engineering. The Open Environmental Engineering Journal. 3: 21–32. ## Zhang, Z.Z. (2013). Complex Network Evolution Model. Doctoral Dissertation of Dalian University.